Re: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: media: starfive: Match driver and yaml property names
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Wed Mar 27 23:28:32 PDT 2024
On 28 March 2024 01:06:42 GMT, Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang at starfivetech.com> wrote:
>Hi, Conor,
>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:24:51AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>[...]
>> > > > > > Do these clocks etc exist but are not used by the driver?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Or do they not exist at all?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The two are very different!
>> > > >
>> > > > > These clocks etc exist but are not used by the driver.
>> > > >
>> > > > That's not an acceptable reason for removing them from the
>> > > > binding. If they exist, they should be documented, regardless of
>> > > > whether the driver makes use of them. NAK.
>> > >
>> > > If so, how to avoid the warning of dtbs_check.
>> >
>> > By also adding the clocks, resets and interrupts to the dts.
>>
>> Going through patchwork stuff now that the merge window is done. I'm gonna
>> mark the dts patch as changes requeted. The binding (and dts) should
>> describe all of the clocks the hardware has, whether or not you choose to use
>> them all in software does not matter. Can you please resend the dts patch,
>> with all of the clocks, resets and interrupts present?
>>
>
>You have applied the dts patch.
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240219032741.18387-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com/
Oh, sorry for the noise then. I guess I was
mislead by patchwork marking this as new :)
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list