[PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: dmaengine: Add dmamux for CV18XX/SG200X series SoC
Inochi Amaoto
inochiama at outlook.com
Tue Mar 26 05:19:37 PDT 2024
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/03/2024 13:06, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> e.
> >>>> + regmap_set_bits(dmamux->regmap,
> >>>> + DMAMUX_CH_REG(chid),
> >>>> + DMAMUX_CH_SET(chid, devid));
> >>>> +
> >>>> + regmap_update_bits(dmamux->regmap, CV1800_SDMA_DMA_INT_MUX,
> >>>> + DMAMUX_INT_CH_MASK(chid, cpuid),
> >>>> + DMAMUX_INT_CH_BIT(chid, cpuid));
> >>>
> >>> I think this is.
> >>
> >> So where exactly? I don't see any define being used here.
> >> CV1800_SDMA_DMA_INT_MUX is not in your header. DMAMUX_ is not in your
> >> header. So what are you pointing?
> >>
> >> I don't understand this communication. Are you mocking me here or what?
> >> It's waste of my time.
> >>
> >
> > I apologize for my misunderstanding and your wasted time. I had
> > previously thought that hardware constants is also binding. This
> > leads to a weird communication between us. Since I agree and
> > understand this file is not a binding, I will remove this file in
> > the next version. Anyway, thanks for your kindly explanation.
>
> OK, no problem. When I asked where do you use header, it should make you
> think... remove the #include from the driver and everything still
> compiles, so obviously header is not being used.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks, I will think and do this for the future patch.
Regards,
Inochi
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list