[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf,riscv: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction

[Björn Töpel]

Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> writes:

> Bjorn, do you think there's anything we can do about these kinda
> misleading CI failures for bpf stuff? Some stuff that touches bpf
> definitely is worth us building, but should we try and build it on top
> of the bpf tree instead?

IMO: The way to go is enabling RV support in the BPF CI (I'll expand on
this in Puranjay's later mail), and ignore BPF series for the RV
patchwork CI. I think having multiple trees in the RV CI is not worth
the pain...

Sort of related is that I think it could be worthwhile only building
series that had some human interaction (a pair of eyes -- "yes, this
does make sense to build"). Right now we're just building everything,
and we have to pay (money *and* time) for it.

...and then the BPF series would e.g. not be built at the RV PW CI.


(But mostly me thinking out loud! ;-))
Björn