[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf,riscv: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction

[Puranjay Mohan]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:19 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:10 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:54:34PM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > > > LLVM generates bpf_addr_space_cast instruction while translating
> > > > pointers between native (zero) address space and
> > > > __attribute__((address_space(N))). The addr_space=0 is reserved as
> > > > bpf_arena address space.
> > > >
> > > > rY = addr_space_cast(rX, 0, 1) is processed by the verifier and
> > > > converted to normal 32-bit move: wX = wY
> > > >
> > > > rY = addr_space_cast(rX, 1, 0) has to be converted by JIT.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12 at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Doesn't compile for allmodconfig:
> > >   ../arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:1086:7: error: call to undeclared function 'insn_is_cast_user'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Conor.
> >
> > Yes,
> > I mentioned in the cover letter that a patch is required.
> > It just got merged in bpf-next/master:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=770546ae9f4c1ae1ebcaf0874f0dd9631d77ec97
> >
> > So, rebasing on the latest bpf-next/master should fix the issue.
>
> Ah, I see now that there was a mention in the cover letter that I did
> not see first time around.
>
> Bjorn, do you think there's anything we can do about these kinda
> misleading CI failures for bpf stuff? Some stuff that touches bpf
> definitely is worth us building, but should we try and build it on top
> of the bpf tree instead?

Is there a separate CI for RISCV related stuff? is it public?

I would be interested in adding RISC-V support in
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf
Is someone already working on this?