[v1, 4/6] riscv: cpufeature: add zve32[xf] and zve64[xfd] isa detection

[Samuel Holland]

Hi Andy,

On 2024-03-12 7:36 AM, Andy Chiu wrote:
> Multiple Vector subextensions are added. Also, the patch takes care of
> the dependencies of Vector subextensions by macro expansions. So, if
> some "embedded" platform only reports "zve64f" on the ISA string, the
> parser is able to expand it to zve32x zve32f zve64x and zve64f.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu at sifive.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h |  5 +++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 5340f818746b..24efea44f1ab 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,11 @@
>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA		71
>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZTSO		72
>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS		73
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32X		74
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F		75
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64X		76
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F		77
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D		78
>  
>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX		128
>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID		U32_MAX
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 8986ceb58188..3aa0df3f3b41 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,40 @@ static const unsigned int riscv_zvbb_exts[] = {
>  	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVKB
>  };
>  
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F_IMPLY_LIST	\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F,		\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32X,
> +
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F_IMPLY_LIST	\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F,		\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64X,		\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F_IMPLY_LIST
> +
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D_IMPLY_LIST	\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D,		\
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F_IMPLY_LIST
> +
> +static const unsigned int riscv_zve32f_exts[] = {
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F_IMPLY_LIST
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int riscv_zve64f_exts[] = {
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F_IMPLY_LIST
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int riscv_zve64d_exts[] = {
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D_IMPLY_LIST
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int riscv_zve64x_exts[] = {
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32X,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64X
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int riscv_v_exts[] = {
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D_IMPLY_LIST
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in
>   * chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification.
> @@ -248,7 +282,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(d, RISCV_ISA_EXT_d),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(q, RISCV_ISA_EXT_q),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(c, RISCV_ISA_EXT_c),
> -	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, riscv_v_exts),

You can use riscv_zve64d_exts here (or #define riscv_v_exts riscv_zve64d_exts)
to avoid allocating a duplicate subextension list.

Regards,
Samuel

>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ),
> @@ -283,6 +317,11 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ztso, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZTSO),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zvbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVBB, riscv_zvbb_exts),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zvbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVBC),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zve32f, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32F, riscv_zve32f_exts),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zve32x, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE32X),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zve64f, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64F, riscv_zve64f_exts),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zve64d, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64D, riscv_zve64d_exts),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zve64x, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVE64X, riscv_zve64x_exts),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zvfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVFH),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zvfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVFHMIN),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zvkb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVKB),