[PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig

Haibo Xu xiaobo55x at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 01:19:52 PST 2024


On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > x86/arm64/loongarch would select ACPI_NUMA by default and riscv
> > would do the same thing, so the dependency is no longer needed
> > since these are the four architectures that support ACPI.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> > Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > index 849c2bd820b9..2bf47ad1ec9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  config ACPI_NUMA
> >       bool "NUMA support"
> >       depends on NUMA
> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> >       default y if ARM64
>
> Can we remove the prompt as well and make this a
> hidden option? I think this is now always selected
> when it can be used anyway.
>
> If we make it
>
>       def_bool NUMA && !X86
>
> then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> can also go away.
>

Good idea!
Shall we include the ACPI in the def_bool definition?

>       Arnd



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list