[PATCH v3 5/7] riscv: Kconfig.socs: Allow SOC_CANAAN with MMU for K230

[Yangyu Chen]

On 2024/3/5 07:46, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/5/24 06:05, Yangyu Chen wrote:
>> Since K230 was released, SOC_CANAAN is no longer only referred to the K210.
>> Remove it depends on !MMU will allow building dts for K230 and remove the
>> K210 string from the help message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy at cyyself.name>
>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 5 ++---
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>> index 623de5f8a208..b4e9b7f75510 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>> @@ -75,13 +75,12 @@ config ARCH_CANAAN
>>   	def_bool SOC_CANAAN
>>   
>>   config SOC_CANAAN
>> -	bool "Canaan Kendryte K210 SoC"
>> -	depends on !MMU
> 
> This seems wrong to me. The k210 support does require no-mmu. So why remove
> this ?

It just allows SOC_CANAAN to be selected when MMU=y. With this patch, 
nommu_k210_defconfig still works.

> Does the k230 have MMU support ? If yes, then I do not think these 2 can
> fall under the same SOC_CANAAN.
> 

Yes, K230 has MMU, you can see the bootlog from the cover letter and the 
dts patch [6/7]. Could you provide some reasons why it can fall? I 
didn't see any differences in .config after this change after executing 
'make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- nommu_k210_defconfig'.

>> +	bool "Canaan Kendryte SoC"
>>   	select CLINT_TIMER if RISCV_M_MODE
>>   	select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
>>   	select PINCTRL
>>   	select COMMON_CLK
>>   	help
>> -	  This enables support for Canaan Kendryte K210 SoC platform hardware.
>> +	  This enables support for Canaan Kendryte SoC platform hardware.
>>   
>>   endmenu # "SoC selection"
>