[RFC PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: starfive: add JH8100 pinctrl bindings
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Mar 5 06:07:16 PST 2024
On 05/03/2024 13:00, Yuklin Soo wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 4:10 PM
>> To: Yuklin Soo <yuklin.soo at starfivetech.com>; Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij at linaro.org>; Bartosz Golaszewski
>> <bartosz.golaszewski at linaro.org>; Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com>;
>> Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan at starfivetech.com>; Jianlong Huang
>> <jianlong.huang at starfivetech.com>; Emil Renner Berthing
>> <kernel at esmil.dk>; Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>;
>> Drew Fustini <drew at beagleboard.org>
>> Cc: linux-gpio at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org; Paul Walmsley
>> <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>; Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>;
>> Albert Ou <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: starfive: add JH8100 pinctrl
>> bindings
>>
>> On 07/02/2024 03:42, Yuklin Soo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + additionalProperties: false
>>>>> + patternProperties:
>>>>> + '-pins$':
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + description: |
>>>>> + A pinctrl node should contain at least one subnode representing
>> the
>>>>> + pinctrl groups available in the domain. Each subnode will list the
>>>>> + pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to
>>>>> + muxer configuration, bias, input enable/disable, input schmitt
>>>>> + trigger enable/disable, slew-rate and drive strength.
>>>>> + allOf:
>>>>> + - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
>>>>> + - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml
>>>>> + additionalProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> Why the rest of the properties is not applicable?
>>>
>>> The regex “-pins$” make sure all client subnode names end with suffix
>>> “-pins” (e.g, i2c0-scl-pins, i2c-sda-pins)
>>
>> I did not talk about subnodes.
>>
>> I asked why the rest of pincfg and pinmux schema properties are not allowed.
>
> Initially, I wanted to allow all properties in the pincfg and pinmux schema. I misunderstood the meaning of “additionalProperties: false”
> and I thought it means all additional properties outside the pincfg and pinmux schema are excluded. The “additionalProperties” will be
> set to “true” to include the rest of the properties in pincfg and pinmux schema and not to be restricted to only the properties defined in
In that case drop all the properties and use unevaluatedProperties: false.
Fix your email setup, to wrap emails properly. This is unreadable.
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list