[PATCH] riscv: Fix early ftrace nop patching
Alexandre Ghiti
alexghiti at rivosinc.com
Tue Jun 18 06:39:50 PDT 2024
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 2:48 PM Andy Chiu <andy.chiu at sifive.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:02 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > On 17/06/2024 15:23, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > Hi Conor,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delay here.
> > >
> > > On 13/06/2024 09:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > >> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:51:34PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > >>> Commit c97bf629963e ("riscv: Fix text patching when IPI are used")
> > >>> converted ftrace_make_nop() to use patch_insn_write() which does not
> > >>> emit any icache flush relying entirely on __ftrace_modify_code() to do
> > >>> that.
> > >>>
> > >>> But we missed that ftrace_make_nop() was called very early directly
> > >>> when
> > >>> converting mcount calls into nops (actually on riscv it converts 2B
> > >>> nops
> > >>> emitted by the compiler into 4B nops).
> > >>>
> > >>> This caused crashes on multiple HW as reported by Conor and Björn since
> > >>> the booting core could have half-patched instructions in its icache
> > >>> which would trigger an illegal instruction trap: fix this by emitting a
> > >>> local flush icache when early patching nops.
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: c97bf629963e ("riscv: Fix text patching when IPI are used")
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti at rivosinc.com>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 ++++++
> > >>> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 +++
> > >>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > >>> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > >>> index dd8d07146116..ce79c558a4c8 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > >>> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ static inline void local_flush_icache_all(void)
> > >>> asm volatile ("fence.i" ::: "memory");
> > >>> }
> > >>> +static inline void local_flush_icache_range(unsigned long start,
> > >>> + unsigned long end)
> > >>> +{
> > >>> + local_flush_icache_all();
> > >>> +}
> > >>> +
> > >>> #define PG_dcache_clean PG_arch_1
> > >>> static inline void flush_dcache_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > >>> index 4f4987a6d83d..32e7c401dfb4 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > >>> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct
> > >>> dyn_ftrace *rec)
> > >>> out = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> > >>> mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > >> So, turns out that this patch is not sufficient. I've seen some more
> > >> crashes, seemingly due to initialising nops on this mutex_unlock().
> > >> Palmer suggested moving the if (!mod) ... into the lock, which fixed
> > >> the problem for me.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok, it makes sense, I completely missed that. I'll send a fix for that
> > > shortly so that it can be merged in rc5.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> >
> >
> > So I digged a bit more and I'm afraid that the only way to make sure
> > this issue does not happen elsewhere is to flush the icache right after
> > the patching. We actually can't wait to batch the icache flush since
> > along the way, we may call a function that has just been patched (the
> > issue that you encountered here).
>
> Trying to provide my thoughts, please let me know if I missed
> anything. I think what Conor suggested is safe for init_nop, as it
> would be called only when there is only one core (booting) and at the
> loading stage of kernel modules. In the first case we just have to
> make sure there is no patchable entry before the core executes
> fence.i. The second case is unconditionally safe because there is no
> read-side of the race.
>
> It is a bit tricky for the generic (runtime) case of ftrace code
> patching, but that is not because of the batch fence.i maintenance. As
> long as there exists a patchable entry for the stopping thread, it is
> possible for them to execute on a partially patched instruction. A
> solution for this is again to prevent any patchable entry in the
> stop_machine's stopping thread. Another solution is to apply the
> atomic ftrace patching series which aims to get rid of the race.
Yeah but my worry is that we can't make sure that functions called
between the patching and the fence.i are not the ones that just get
patched. At least today, patch_insn_write() etc should be marked as
noinstr. But even then, we call core functions that could be patchable
(I went through all and it *seems* we are safe *for now*, but this is
very fragile).
Then what do you think we should do to fix Conor's issue right now:
should we mark the riscv specific functions as noinstr, cross fingers
that the core functions are not (and don't become) patchable and wait
for your atomic patching? Or should we flush as soon as possible as I
proposed above (which to me fixes the issue but hurts performance)?
Thanks,
Alex
>
> >
> > I don't know how much it will impact the performance but I guess it will.
> >
> > Unless someone has a better idea (I added Andy and Puranjay in cc), here
> > is the patch that implements this, can you give it a try? Thanks
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index 87cbd86576b2..4b95c574fd04 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> > @@ -120,9 +120,6 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct
> > dyn_ftrace *rec)
> > out = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> > mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> >
> > - if (!mod)
> > - local_flush_icache_range(rec->ip, rec->ip +
> > MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> > -
> > return out;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -156,9 +153,9 @@ static int __ftrace_modify_code(void *data)
> > } else {
> > while (atomic_read(¶m->cpu_count) <= num_online_cpus())
> > cpu_relax();
> > - }
> >
> > - local_flush_icache_all();
> > + local_flush_icache_all();
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> > index 4007563fb607..ab03732d06c4 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> > @@ -89,6 +89,14 @@ static int __patch_insn_set(void *addr, u8 c, size_t len)
> >
> > memset(waddr, c, len);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * We could have just patched a function that is about to be
> > + * called so make sure we don't execute partially patched
> > + * instructions by flushing the icache as soon as possible.
> > + */
> > + local_flush_icache_range((unsigned long)waddr,
> > + (unsigned long)waddr + len);
> > +
> > patch_unmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
> >
> > if (across_pages)
> > @@ -135,6 +143,14 @@ static int __patch_insn_write(void *addr, const
> > void *insn, size_t len)
> >
> > ret = copy_to_kernel_nofault(waddr, insn, len);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * We could have just patched a function that is about to be
> > + * called so make sure we don't execute partially patched
> > + * instructions by flushing the icache as soon as possible.
> > + */
> > + local_flush_icache_range((unsigned long)waddr,
> > + (unsigned long)waddr + len);
> > +
> > patch_unmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
> >
> > if (across_pages)
> > @@ -189,9 +205,6 @@ int patch_text_set_nosync(void *addr, u8 c, size_t len)
> >
> > ret = patch_insn_set(tp, c, len);
> >
> > - if (!ret)
> > - flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)tp, (uintptr_t)tp + len);
> > -
> > return ret;
> > }
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_set_nosync);
> > @@ -224,9 +237,6 @@ int patch_text_nosync(void *addr, const void *insns,
> > size_t len)
> >
> > ret = patch_insn_write(tp, insns, len);
> >
> > - if (!ret)
> > - flush_icache_range((uintptr_t) tp, (uintptr_t) tp + len);
> > -
> > return ret;
> > }
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_nosync);
> > @@ -253,9 +263,9 @@ static int patch_text_cb(void *data)
> > } else {
> > while (atomic_read(&patch->cpu_count) <= num_online_cpus())
> > cpu_relax();
> > - }
> >
> > - local_flush_icache_all();
> > + local_flush_icache_all();
> > + }
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> + if (!mod)
> > >>> + local_flush_icache_range(rec->ip, rec->ip + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> > >>> +
> > >>> return out;
> > >>> }
> > >>> --
> > >>> 2.39.2
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> linux-riscv mailing list
> > >>> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list