[PATCH v3 10/26] x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
Mike Rapoport
rppt at kernel.org
Wed Jul 31 23:08:10 PDT 2024
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt at kernel.org>
Allocation of numa_distance uses memblock_phys_alloc_range() to limit
allocation to be below the last mapped page.
But NUMA initializaition runs after the direct map is populated and
there is also code in setup_arch() that adjusts memblock limit to
reflect how much memory is already mapped in the direct map.
Simplify the allocation of numa_distance and use plain memblock_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt at kernel.org>
Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy at nvidia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 5e1dde26674b..edfc38803779 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
size_t size;
int i, j, cnt = 0;
- u64 phys;
/* size the new table and allocate it */
nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed;
@@ -342,16 +341,14 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
cnt++;
size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
- phys = memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, 0,
- PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped));
- if (!phys) {
+ numa_distance = memblock_alloc(size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!numa_distance) {
pr_warn("Warning: can't allocate distance table!\n");
/* don't retry until explicitly reset */
numa_distance = (void *)1LU;
return -ENOMEM;
}
- numa_distance = __va(phys);
numa_distance_cnt = cnt;
/* fill with the default distances */
--
2.43.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list