[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml: Add Sophgo SARADC binding documentation

[Thomas Bonnefille]

On 7/31/24 2:41 PM, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:24:14PM GMT, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
>> The Sophgo SARADC is a Successive Approximation ADC that can be found in
>> the Sophgo SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml     | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..79d8cb52279f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title:
>> +  Sophgo CV18XX SoC series 3 channels Successive Approximation Analog to
>> +  Digital Converters
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> +  Datasheet at https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
> 
> There is no need to use "oneOF" and "items"
> 

Thank you very much, I'll do that.

> Suggestions: add a compatible like "cv1800-saradc" as fallback
> and add use "sophgo,cv1800b-saradc" as specific compatible.
> Use the "cv1800-saradc" in the cv18xx.dtsi and override the
> compatible with specific one if necessary.
> 

If I understand correctly, maintainers doesn't want the use of wildcards 
as generic compatibles [1]. They prefer to use the most basic SoC as the 
generic compatible.
Is the CV1800 a real SoC or is it just a kind of wildcard to say CV18* ?

> For example:
> - items:
>      - enum:
>          - sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
>      - const: sophgo,cv1800-saradc
> - const: sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
> 

To avoid the issue of falling back on a wildcard I planned to do this 
instead:
properties:
   compatible:
     const: sophgo,cv1800b-saradc



> Regards,
> Inochi

[1] : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240708165719.000021b9@Huawei.com/

Thank you for your comments :)
Thomas