[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add Sophgo CV1800 thermal
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Thu Jul 18 03:53:56 PDT 2024
On 18/07/2024 09:04, Haylen Chu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/07/2024 07:19, Haylen Chu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:05:10AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>>>> Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it
>>>> everywhere?
>>>>
>>>> Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.
>>>
>>> I would prefer "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" and use it everywhere. I don't
>>> see any difference on thermal sensors between cv18xx-series SoCs.
>>
>> Please use proper fallbacks - there is a very specific rule, repeated
>> many times:
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L42
>
> Just in case I misunderstood,
>
> You would prefer different SoC-specific compatible strings like
> "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" "sophgo,sg2002-thermal" added to the driver,
There is nothing in above - comment or guideline - mentioning drivers.
> and each thermal-sensor node contains two compatible strings, one
> matches the SoC exactly and one is "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" just as a
> fallback, right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list