[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add Sophgo CV1800 thermal
Haylen Chu
heylenay at outlook.com
Tue Jul 16 22:30:41 PDT 2024
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:27:35AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > And allow me clarify, what I said "a compatible that matches an actual SoC
> > and use it everywhere" means to define "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" just as
> > Haylen did and use it for all cv18xx SoC chips.
> >
>
> I know it. But there may be something like the pinctrl. They share the same
> logic, but have different data and layout. In fact, I am sure the thermal
> is not suitable for this case.
But for the thermal sensor, they are exactly the same, I don't think
it's worth to add compatible strings for each SoC. Even though later
SoCs do come with a different design, we could add a new one with
little pain.
Best regards,
Haylen
> > Anyway, as Conor suggested, we'd better not use wildcards (char 'x') in
> > compatibles.
> >
>
> Yeah, I agree.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chen
> >
> > > > Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.
> > > SoC specific compatible means most of the SoC have different part
> > > for this peripheral. For safety, it may not use the fallback
> > > generic compatible.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Inochi
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list