[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml: Add Sophgo SARADC binding documentation

Conor Dooley conor at kernel.org
Fri Jul 5 08:01:17 PDT 2024


On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
> The Sophgo SARADC is a Successive Approximation ADC that can be found in
> the Sophgo SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml     | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..31bd8ac6dfa5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title:
> +  Sophgo CV18XX SoC series 3 channels Successive Approximation Analog to
> +  Digital Converters
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  Datasheet at https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
> +          - const: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc

I don't think the fallback here makes sense. If there's other devices
with a compatible programming model added later, we can fall back to the
cv1800b.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    description:
> +      SARADC will use the presence of this clock to determine if the controller
> +      needs to be explicitly clocked by it (Active domain) or if it is part of
> +      the No-Die Domain, along with the RTC, which does not require explicit
> +      clocking.

What does "explicit clocking" mean? Is it clocked directly (or via
dividers) by a clock on the board or another source?

Cheers,
Conor.

> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    /* ADC in the Active domain */
> +    adc at 30f0000 {
> +        compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-saradc", "sophgo,cv18xx-saradc";
> +        clocks = <&clk CLK_SARADC>;
> +        interrupts = <100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +        reg = <0x030F0000 0x1000>;
> +    };
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    /* ADC in the No-Die domain */
> +    adc at 502c000 {
> +        compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-saradc", "sophgo,cv18xx-saradc";
> +        reg = <0x0502C000 0x1000>;
> +    };
> 
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240705/daff63c0/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-riscv mailing list