[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml: Add Sophgo SARADC binding documentation
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Fri Jul 5 08:01:17 PDT 2024
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
> The Sophgo SARADC is a Successive Approximation ADC that can be found in
> the Sophgo SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..31bd8ac6dfa5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title:
> + Sophgo CV18XX SoC series 3 channels Successive Approximation Analog to
> + Digital Converters
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille at bootlin.com>
> +
> +description:
> + Datasheet at https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
> + - const: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc
I don't think the fallback here makes sense. If there's other devices
with a compatible programming model added later, we can fall back to the
cv1800b.
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + description:
> + SARADC will use the presence of this clock to determine if the controller
> + needs to be explicitly clocked by it (Active domain) or if it is part of
> + the No-Die Domain, along with the RTC, which does not require explicit
> + clocking.
What does "explicit clocking" mean? Is it clocked directly (or via
dividers) by a clock on the board or another source?
Cheers,
Conor.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + /* ADC in the Active domain */
> + adc at 30f0000 {
> + compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-saradc", "sophgo,cv18xx-saradc";
> + clocks = <&clk CLK_SARADC>;
> + interrupts = <100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg = <0x030F0000 0x1000>;
> + };
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + /* ADC in the No-Die domain */
> + adc at 502c000 {
> + compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-saradc", "sophgo,cv18xx-saradc";
> + reg = <0x0502C000 0x1000>;
> + };
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240705/daff63c0/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list