[PATCH v2] riscv: stacktrace: Add USER_STACKTRACE support

[Björn Töpel]

Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com> writes:

> Currently, userstacktrace is unsupported for riscv. So use the
> perf_callchain_user() code as blueprint to implement the
> arch_stack_walk_user() which add userstacktrace support on riscv.
> Meanwhile, we can use arch_stack_walk_user() to simplify the implementation
> of perf_callchain_user().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406012109.PDAjXm2i-lkp@intel.com/

For future reference: The LTP tags shouldn't be used when you're
spinning a new version.

> ---
> v2:
> - Fix the cocci warning, !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B.
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                 |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 46 ++----------------------------
>  arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c     | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 0525ee2d63c7..6ed96d935b8f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config RISCV
>  	select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
>  	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>  	select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
> +	select USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>  	select ZONE_DMA32 if 64BIT
>  
>  config CLANG_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> index 3348a61de7d9..c7468af77c66 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> @@ -6,37 +6,9 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>  
> -/*
> - * Get the return address for a single stackframe and return a pointer to the
> - * next frame tail.
> - */
> -static unsigned long user_backtrace(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
> -				    unsigned long fp, unsigned long reg_ra)
> +static bool fill_callchain(void *entry, unsigned long pc)
>  {
> -	struct stackframe buftail;
> -	unsigned long ra = 0;
> -	unsigned long __user *user_frame_tail =
> -		(unsigned long __user *)(fp - sizeof(struct stackframe));
> -
> -	/* Check accessibility of one struct frame_tail beyond */
> -	if (!access_ok(user_frame_tail, sizeof(buftail)))
> -		return 0;
> -	if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(&buftail, user_frame_tail,
> -				      sizeof(buftail)))
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (reg_ra != 0)
> -		ra = reg_ra;
> -	else
> -		ra = buftail.ra;
> -
> -	fp = buftail.fp;
> -	if (ra != 0)
> -		perf_callchain_store(entry, ra);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	return fp;
> +	return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -56,19 +28,7 @@ static unsigned long user_backtrace(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>  void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>  			 struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	unsigned long fp = 0;
> -
> -	fp = regs->s0;
> -	perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->epc);
> -
> -	fp = user_backtrace(entry, fp, regs->ra);
> -	while (fp && !(fp & 0x3) && entry->nr < entry->max_stack)
> -		fp = user_backtrace(entry, fp, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static bool fill_callchain(void *entry, unsigned long pc)
> -{
> -	return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0;
> +	arch_stack_walk_user(fill_callchain, entry, regs);
>  }
>  
>  void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 528ec7cc9a62..9685a2baa5d9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -161,3 +161,46 @@ noinline void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie
>  {
>  	walk_stackframe(task, regs, consume_entry, cookie);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the return address for a single stackframe and return a pointer to the
> + * next frame tail.
> + */
> +static unsigned long unwind_user_frame(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
> +				       void *cookie, unsigned long fp,
> +				       unsigned long reg_ra)
> +{
> +	struct stackframe buftail;
> +	unsigned long ra = 0;
> +	unsigned long __user *user_frame_tail =
> +		(unsigned long __user *)(fp - sizeof(struct stackframe));
> +
> +	/* Check accessibility of one struct frame_tail beyond */
> +	if (!access_ok(user_frame_tail, sizeof(buftail)))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(&buftail, user_frame_tail,
> +				      sizeof(buftail)))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ra = reg_ra ? : buftail.ra;
> +
> +	fp = buftail.fp;
> +	if (!ra || !consume_entry(cookie, ra))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return fp;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_stack_walk_user(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
> +			  const struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long fp = 0;
> +
> +	fp = regs->s0;
> +	if (!consume_entry(cookie, regs->epc))
> +		return;
> +
> +	fp = unwind_user_frame(consume_entry, cookie, fp, regs->ra);
> +	while (fp && !(fp & 0x3))

Just an observation that the "entry->nr < entry->max_stack" check was
removed in this generalization, but that's OK since it's checked in
perf_callchain_store().

Not really part of your change, but shouldn't the check be 0x7 (checking
for 16B sp/fp alignment), rather than 0x3?


Björn