[PATCH v3 00/15] mm/memory: optimize fork() with PTE-mapped THP
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Wed Jan 31 04:59:56 PST 2024
>>
>> I'm also surprised about the dontneed vs. munmap numbers.
>
> You mean the ones for Altra that I posted? (I didn't post any for M2). The altra
> numbers look ok to me; dontneed has no change, and munmap has no change for
> order-0 and is massively improved for order-9.
I would expect that dontneed would similarly benefit -- same code path.
But I focused on munmap measurements for now, I'll try finding time to
confirm that it's the same on Intel.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list