[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] riscv, bpf: Using kvcalloc to allocate cache buffer

[Pu Lehui]

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>

It is unnecessary to allocate continuous physical memory for cache
buffer, and when ebpf program is too large, it may cause memory
allocation failure.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++--
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c   | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index fda6b4f6a4c1..74f995abf2c2 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	}
 
 	if (fmod_ret->nr_links) {
-		branches_off = kcalloc(fmod_ret->nr_links, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+		branches_off = kvcalloc(fmod_ret->nr_links, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!branches_off)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 
 	ret = ctx->ninsns;
 out:
-	kfree(branches_off);
+	kvfree(branches_off);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
index b271240f48c9..5ba68b1888ab 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 
 	ctx->prog = prog;
-	ctx->offset = kcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+	ctx->offset = kvcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx->offset) {
 		prog = orig_prog;
 		goto out_offset;
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
 		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
 out_offset:
-		kfree(ctx->offset);
+		kvfree(ctx->offset);
 		kfree(jit_data);
 		prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
 	}
-- 
2.34.1