[PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Fix CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH with tip of tree LLVM
Andy Chiu
andy.chiu at sifive.com
Sat Jan 27 18:57:24 PST 2024
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 5:03 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have
> > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on
> > invalid input has started succeeding.
> >
> > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an
> > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error,
> > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported.
> >
> > This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with
> > '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror',
> > which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid
> > test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings.
> >
> > I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures
> > that use as-instr and I have found no issues.
> >
> > I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with
> > sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :)
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ac9fe69f70a2b3541266daedbaaa7dc9c007a2a
> >
> > ---
> > Nathan Chancellor (2):
> > kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation
> > RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH
> >
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 -
> > scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
> > scripts/Makefile.compiler | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Looks good,
>
> Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers at google.com>
>
> Unfortunately another LLVM commit just broke TOOLCHAIN_HAS_VECTOR_CRYPTO, so
> I've sent out a patch to fix that too...
>
> But with all the fixes applied it works again.
>
> - Eric
For this series
Tested-by: Andy Chiu <andybnac at gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Chiu <andybnac at gmail.com>
Thanks,
Andy
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list