[RFC PATCH v1 05/28] riscv: zicfiss/zicfilp enumeration

[Deepak Gupta]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:59:24PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>Yo,
>
>Series is RFC, so not gonna review it in depth, just wanted to comment
>on this particular patch.
>
>On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:21:30PM -0800, debug at rivosinc.com wrote:
>> From: Deepak Gupta <debug at rivosinc.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for detecting zicfiss and zicfilp. zicfiss and zicfilp
>> stands for unprivleged integer spec extension for shadow stack and branch
>> tracking on indirect branches, respectively.
>>
>> This patch looks for zicfiss and zicfilp in device tree and accordinlgy lights
>> up bit in cpu feature bitmap. Furthermore this patch adds detection utility
>> functions to return whether shadow stack or landing pads are supported by
>> cpu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug at rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h      |  2 ++
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h  |  1 +
>>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c      |  2 ++
>>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> index a418c3112cd6..216190731c55 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> @@ -133,4 +133,22 @@ static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(int cpu, const unsi
>>  	return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline bool cpu_supports_shadow_stack(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
>
>In passing, I don't see any reason for not using IS_ENABLED() here.

No reason. I should probably do that. More readable.
Thanks.

>
>> +	return riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICFISS);
>> +#else
>> +	return false;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
>> +	return riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICFILP);
>> +#else
>> +	return false;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
>> index 06d30526ef3b..918165cfb4fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
>>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM		42
>>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMSTATEEN		43
>>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICOND		44
>> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS	45
>> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP	46
>>
>>  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX		64
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
>> index f19f861cda54..ee2f51787ff8 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>  #include <vdso/processor.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/hwcap.h>
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>  #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW	(UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1))
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 98623393fd1f..16624bc9a46b 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
>>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL),
>>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT),
>>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT),
>> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicfiss, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS),
>> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicfilp, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP),
>
>Anything you add to this array, you need to document in a dt-binding.

You mean Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
(or possibly any other yaml if needed?)

>Also, you added these in the wrong place. There's a massive comment
>before the array describing the order entries must be in, please take a
>look.

I see the comment.
In my defense, looks like I missed it when I was rebasing.

Will fix it.

>
>Thanks,
>Conor.
>
>
>>  };
>>
>>  const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv