[PATCH v8 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo system control module

Chen Wang unicorn_wang at outlook.com
Tue Jan 23 01:28:15 PST 2024


On 2024/1/22 20:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 11:11, Chen Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/clock/sophgo,sg2042-sysclk.yaml#
>>>>>>> +    type: object
>>>>>> Why isn't this merged here? You do not need the child node really...
>>>>>> unless the clock inputs are specific to that clock controller and you
>>>>>> will have here more devices? But where are they in such case?
>>>>> I don't see more devices will be included later. It should be ok to
>>>>> merge them into one.
>>>> hi, Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> After some double check, I find we will have more devices in
>>>> system-control. For example, in the SYS_CTRL area, there is also a
>>>> section of registers used to control the "General Purpose Interrupt".
>>>> The pcie controller of sg2042 will use this interrupt controller which
>>>> is defined in SYS_CTRL, we will add it in later work.
>>>>
>>> I expect then all devices to be documented.
>> hi, Krzysztof.
>>
>> First, I'm very sorry for having double-checked with you for this system
>> controller and child node issue, but this time I'm sure there should be
>> no more child nodes except the clock and interrupt controllers, though
>> there are some other registers in SYS_CTRL section, but we will not use
>> them till now.
>>
>> One question, when you say "to be documented", do you mean I need write
>> binding/yaml files for other child node? But they exceed the scope of
>> this patchset (this patchset is for clock support only). That's why I
> That's not true. The scope of this patch is to add DT binding
> description for your device. If you choose any other scope, I don't
> agree and I am not going to provide positive review.
>
>> suggest just add clock-controller in this patchset and to add the
>> interrupt controller in another patchset for pcie support. This
>> mechanism should be suitable for our expansion.
> How then are you going to solve the requirement: "DO attempt to make
> bindings complete even"?
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L17
Learned and I will try to make bindings for system-controller device 
complete, thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list