[PATCH v8 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo system control module

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Jan 16 04:15:26 PST 2024


On 16/01/2024 12:37, Chen Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2024/1/16 18:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/01/2024 08:21, Chen Wang wrote:
>>> From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang at outlook.com>
>>>
>>> Add documentation to describe Sophgo System Control for SG2042.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang at outlook.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml     | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..7b50bb56b4cf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Sophgo SG2042 SoC system control
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Chen Wang <unicorn_wang at outlook.com>
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  The Sophgo system control is a registers block (SYS_CTRL), providing multiple
>>> +  low level platform functions like chip configuration, clock control, etc.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clock-controller:
>>> +    # Child node
>> Drop the comment, it is obvious. It cannot be anything else.
>>
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/clock/sophgo,sg2042-sysclk.yaml#
>>> +    type: object
>> Why isn't this merged here? You do not need the child node really...
>> unless the clock inputs are specific to that clock controller and you
>> will have here more devices? But where are they in such case?
> I don't see more devices will be included later. It should be ok to 
> merge them into one.
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - clock-controller
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    system-control at 30010000 {
>> Why did you change the name? Please provide detailed changelog with
>> explanation of such changes.
> 
> I changed the name due to I find the 
> TRM(https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/blob/main/SG2042/TRM/source/system-control.rst) 
> call it "system control",  so I changed it in v8.
> 
> Which one do you prefer? I'm not sure if there are any requirements for 
> this?

Node names should be generic and follow common guidelines, not match
your TRM. Please use the same name all other devices use for the same class.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list