[RFC PATCH 07/13] crypto: riscv - add vector crypto accelerated AES-{ECB,CBC,CTR,XTS}

Jerry Shih jerry.shih at sifive.com
Thu Jan 4 00:47:16 PST 2024


On Jan 3, 2024, at 22:50, Eric Biggers <ebiggers at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 12:47:33AM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/crypto/Makefile b/arch/riscv/crypto/Makefile
>> index dca698c5cba3e..5dd91f34f0d52 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/crypto/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/crypto/Makefile
>> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> #
>> # linux/arch/riscv/crypto/Makefile
>> #
>> 
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_RISCV64) += aes-riscv64.o
>> aes-riscv64-y := aes-riscv64-glue.o aes-riscv64-zvkned.o
>> +
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_BLOCK_RISCV64) += aes-block-riscv64.o
>> +aes-block-riscv64-y := aes-riscv64-block-mode-glue.o aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvbb-zvkg.o aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvkb.o
> 
> A bug I noticed (which is also present in Jerry's patchset) is that some of the
> code of the aes-block-riscv64 module is located in aes-riscv64-zvkned.S, which
> isn't built into that module but rather into aes-riscv64.  This causes a build
> error when both CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_RISCV64 and CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_BLOCK_RISCV64
> are set to 'm':
> 
>    ERROR: modpost: "aes_cbc_decrypt_zvkned" [arch/riscv/crypto/aes-block-riscv64.ko] undefined!
>    ERROR: modpost: "aes_ecb_decrypt_zvkned" [arch/riscv/crypto/aes-block-riscv64.ko] undefined!
>    ERROR: modpost: "aes_cbc_encrypt_zvkned" [arch/riscv/crypto/aes-block-riscv64.ko] undefined!
>    ERROR: modpost: "aes_ecb_encrypt_zvkned" [arch/riscv/crypto/aes-block-riscv64.ko] undefined!
> 
> To fix this, I think we should just merge the two modules and kconfig options
> together so that there is one module that provides both the AES modes and the
> AES single-block cipher.  That's how x86's aesni-intel works, for example.
> 
> - Eric

That's a bug in my patchset.
I don't test with all options with `M` settings since I can't boot to qemu with all `M` settings.

Could we move the cbc and ecb from `aes-riscv64-zvkned` to `aes-block-riscv64` instead of merging
these two modules?
Thus, we could still enable the single aes block cipher without other extensions(e.g. zvbb or zvkg).

-Jerry


More information about the linux-riscv mailing list