[PATCH v15 15/23] PCI: microchip: Add event irqchip field to host port and add PLDA irqchip

Minda Chen minda.chen at starfivetech.com
Wed Feb 21 02:10:48 PST 2024



> 
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:02 PM Minda Chen <minda.chen at starfivetech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > As PLDA dts binding doc(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/
> > > plda,xpressrich3-axi-common.yaml) showed, PLDA PCIe contains an
> > > interrupt controller.
> > >
> > > Microchip PolarFire PCIE event IRQs includes PLDA interrupts and
> > > Polarfire their own interrupts. The interrupt irqchip ops includes
> > > ack/mask/unmask interrupt ops, which will write correct registers.
> > > Microchip Polarfire PCIe additional interrupts require to write
> > > Polarfire SoC self-defined registers. So Microchip PCIe event irqchip ops can
> not be re-used.
> > >
> > > To support PLDA its own event IRQ process, implements PLDA irqchip
> > > ops and add event irqchip field to struct pcie_plda_rp.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen at starfivetech.com>
> > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h       |  3 +
> > >  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > index b3df373a2141..beaf5c27da84 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > @@ -770,6 +770,64 @@ static struct irq_chip mc_event_irq_chip = {
> > >       .irq_unmask = mc_unmask_event_irq,  };
> > >
> > Hi Thomas
> >   I think this patch code it is easy to review. If you busy, Could you
> > let other IRQ maintainer review? Thanks.
> >
> > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn and Krzysztof
> 
> Hi Minda,
> 
> This patchset seems to have broken threading (lore, mailman). I have seen other
> folks on IRC mentioning that too.
> 
> I am not sure if that requires re-sending, but let's wait for others to comment.
> 
> Cheers,
> david
> 
Do you mean the auto test error in linux-riscv? 
I can see that. But In v14 resend version, There is no error. Version 15 just add
a new patch. Other no change. It is very strange.
If not this error, I will waiting others comment.

> >   Now the code is pending several weeks. Maybe this patch is blocking.
> > Actually I write irqchip ops(ack/mask/unmask) like microchip irqchip ops.
> > They looks very simple that write PLDA mask or status register. They
> > all call the same function plda_hwirq_to_mask(). Now you can see this
> function below.
> > Except INTx interrupt, one irqnum mapping to one register bit. The
> > PLDA register graph can be seen 14th patch, which can show all the
> > PLDA interrupts and easy to  get PLDA codes logic.
> >
> >   Now the 6.9-next will be closed less than 20 days. I still hope the
> > refactoring patches (patch 1 - 16) can be accepted to 6.9. (Starfive
> > and PLDA patches have to be delayed to 6.10 or later). I will try my
> > best to achieve it because this series patches reviewed lasts a long period and
> Conor have reviewed all the refactoring patches.
> >
> > I have no experience in refactoring code before this series patches. I try my
> best to do this.
> > Maybe I did something wrong in this. Please forgive me.
> >
> > > +static u32 plda_hwirq_to_mask(int hwirq) {
> > > +     u32 mask;
> > > +
> > > +     /* hwirq 23 - 0 are the same with register */
> > > +     if (hwirq < EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > > +             mask = BIT(hwirq);
> > > +     else if (hwirq == EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > > +             mask = PM_MSI_INT_INTX_MASK;
> > > +     else
> > > +             mask = BIT(hwirq + PCI_NUM_INTX - 1);
> > > +
> > > +     return mask;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_ack_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > +     struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > +
> > > +     writel_relaxed(plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq),
> > > +                    port->bridge_addr + ISTATUS_LOCAL); }
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_mask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > +     struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > +     u32 mask, val;
> > > +
> > > +     mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > > +
> > > +     raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > +     val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > +     val &= ~mask;
> > > +     writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > +     raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_unmask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > +     struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > +     u32 mask, val;
> > > +
> > > +     mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > > +
> > > +     raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > +     val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > +     val |= mask;
> > > +     writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > +     raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct irq_chip plda_event_irq_chip = {
> > > +     .name = "PLDA PCIe EVENT",
> > > +     .irq_ack = plda_ack_event_irq,
> > > +     .irq_mask = plda_mask_event_irq,
> > > +     .irq_unmask = plda_unmask_event_irq, };
> > > +
> > >  static const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops = {
> > >       .get_events = plda_get_events,  }; @@ -777,7 +835,9 @@ static
> > > const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops = {  static int
> > > plda_pcie_event_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> > >                              irq_hw_number_t hwirq)  {
> > > -     irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &mc_event_irq_chip,
> handle_level_irq);
> > > +     struct plda_pcie_rp *port = (void *)domain->host_data;
> > > +
> > > +     irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, port->event_irq_chip,
> handle_level_irq);
> > >       irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> > >
> > >       return 0;
> > > @@ -962,6 +1022,9 @@ static int plda_init_interrupts(struct
> platform_device
> > > *pdev,
> > >       if (!port->event_ops)
> > >               port->event_ops = &plda_event_ops;
> > >
> > > +     if (!port->event_irq_chip)
> > > +             port->event_irq_chip = &plda_event_irq_chip;
> > > +
> > >       ret = plda_pcie_init_irq_domains(port);
> > >       if (ret) {
> > >               dev_err(dev, "failed creating IRQ domains\n"); @@
> -1039,6 +1102,7
> > > @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg)
> > >               return ret;
> > >
> > >       port->plda.event_ops = &mc_event_ops;
> > > +     port->plda.event_irq_chip = &mc_event_irq_chip;
> > >
> > >       /* Address translation is up; safe to enable interrupts */
> > >       ret = plda_init_interrupts(pdev, &port->plda, &mc_event); diff --git
> > > a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > index e0e5e7cc8434..a3ce01735bea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ enum plda_int_event {
> > >
> > >  #define PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS                  16
> > >
> > > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_INTX)
> > > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_MSI
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_MSI)
> > >  #define PLDA_MAX_EVENT_NUM
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_INT_EVENT_NUM)
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -155,6 +157,7 @@ struct plda_pcie_rp {
> > >       raw_spinlock_t lock;
> > >       struct plda_msi msi;
> > >       const struct plda_event_ops *event_ops;
> > > +     const struct irq_chip *event_irq_chip;
> > >       void __iomem *bridge_addr;
> > >       int num_events;
> > >  };
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv


More information about the linux-riscv mailing list