[PATCH RFC v4 01/15] ACPI: Only enumerate enabled (or functional) processor devices

Rafael J. Wysocki rafael at kernel.org
Thu Feb 15 12:10:39 PST 2024


On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:49 PM Russell King <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> From: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
>
> Today the ACPI enumeration code 'visits' all devices that are present.
>
> This is a problem for arm64, where CPUs are always present, but not
> always enabled. When a device-check occurs because the firmware-policy
> has changed and a CPU is now enabled, the following error occurs:
> | acpi ACPI0007:48: Enumeration failure
>
> This is ultimately because acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() returns
> true for a device that is not enabled. The ACPI Processor driver
> will not register such CPUs as they are not 'decoding their resources'.
>
> ACPI allows a device to be functional instead of maintaining the
> present and enabled bit, but we can't simply check the enabled bit
> for all devices since firmware can be buggy.
>
> If ACPI indicates that the device is present and enabled, then all well
> and good, we can enumate it. However, if the device is present and not
> enabled, then we also check whether the device is a processor device
> to limit the impact of this new check to just processor devices.
>
> This avoids enumerating present && functional processor devices that
> are not enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v2:
>  * Incorporate comment suggestion by Gavin Shan.
> Changes since RFC v3:
>  * Fixed "sert" typo.
> Changes since RFC v3 (smaller series):
>  * Restrict checking the enabled bit to processor devices, update
>    commit comments.
>  * Use Rafael's suggestion in
>    https://lore.kernel.org/r/5760569.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher
>  * Updated with a fix - see:
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zbe8WQRASx6D6RaG@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 11 +++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/device_pm.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h       |  4 ++-
>  drivers/acpi/property.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c           | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index 4fe2ef54088c..cf7c1cca69dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -626,6 +626,17 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = {
>         },
>  };
>
> +bool acpi_device_is_processor(const struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> +       if (adev->device_type == ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       if (adev->device_type != ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       return acpi_scan_check_handler(adev, &processor_handler);
> +}
> +
>  static int acpi_processor_container_attach(struct acpi_device *dev,
>                                            const struct acpi_device_id *id)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> index 3b4d048c4941..e3c80f3b3b57 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int acpi_bus_init_power(struct acpi_device *device)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         device->power.state = ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN;
> -       if (!acpi_device_is_present(device)) {
> +       if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(device)) {
>                 device->flags.initialized = false;
>                 return -ENXIO;
>         }
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> index 23373faa35ec..a0256d2493a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int create_pnp_modalias(const struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalia
>         struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
>
>         /* Avoid unnecessarily loading modules for non present devices. */
> -       if (!acpi_device_is_present(acpi_dev))
> +       if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(acpi_dev))
>                 return 0;
>
>         /*
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 6588525c45ef..1bc8b6db60c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ void acpi_sysfs_add_hotplug_profile(struct acpi_hotplug_profile *hotplug,
>  int acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
>                                        const char *hotplug_profile_name);
>  void acpi_scan_hotplug_enabled(struct acpi_hotplug_profile *hotplug, bool val);
> +bool acpi_scan_check_handler(const struct acpi_device *adev,
> +                            struct acpi_scan_handler *handler);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  extern struct dentry *acpi_debugfs_dir;
> @@ -121,7 +123,6 @@ int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
>  void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
>  void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device);
>  void acpi_free_pnp_ids(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp);
> -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev);
>  bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
>  bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
>                                         const struct device *dev);
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ int acpi_bus_register_early_device(int type);
>  const struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev);
>  int __acpi_device_uevent_modalias(const struct acpi_device *adev,
>                                   struct kobj_uevent_env *env);
> +bool acpi_device_is_processor(const struct acpi_device *adev);
>
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                    Power Resource
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> index a6ead5204046..9f8d54038770 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static bool acpi_fwnode_device_is_available(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>         if (!is_acpi_device_node(fwnode))
>                 return false;
>
> -       return acpi_device_is_present(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
> +       return acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
>  }
>
>  static const void *
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index e6ed1ba91e5c..fd2e8b3a5749 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
>         int error;
>
>         acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> -       if (acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> +       if (acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) {
>                 /*
>                  * This function is only called for device objects for which
>                  * matching scan handlers exist.  The only situation in which
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
>         int error;
>
>         acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> -       if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> +       if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) {
>                 acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
>                 return 0;
>         }
> @@ -1917,11 +1917,6 @@ static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev)
> -{
> -       return adev->status.present || adev->status.functional;
> -}
> -
>  static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
>                                        const char *idstr,
>                                        const struct acpi_device_id **matchid)
> @@ -1942,6 +1937,18 @@ static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
>         return false;
>  }
>
> +bool acpi_scan_check_handler(const struct acpi_device *adev,
> +                            struct acpi_scan_handler *handler)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid;
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(hwid, &adev->pnp.ids, list)
> +               if (acpi_scan_handler_matching(handler, hwid->id, NULL))
> +                       return true;
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  static struct acpi_scan_handler *acpi_scan_match_handler(const char *idstr,
>                                         const struct acpi_device_id **matchid)
>  {
> @@ -2405,16 +2412,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
>   * acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration - Check if the ACPI device is ready for enumeration
>   * @device: Pointer to the &struct acpi_device to check
>   *
> - * Check if the device is present and has no unmet dependencies.
> + * Check if the device is functional or enabled and has no unmet dependencies.
>   *
> - * Return true if the device is ready for enumeratino. Otherwise, return false.
> + * Return true if the device is ready for enumeration. Otherwise, return false.
>   */
>  bool acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(const struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
>         if (device->flags.honor_deps && device->dep_unmet)
>                 return false;
>
> -       return acpi_device_is_present(device);
> +       /*
> +        * ACPI 6.5's 6.3.7 "_STA (Device Status)" allows firmware to return
> +        * (!present && functional) for certain types of devices that should be
> +        * enumerated. Note that the enabled bit should not be set unless the
> +        * present bit is set.
> +        *
> +        * However, limit this only to processor devices to reduce possible
> +        * regressions with firmware.
> +        */
> +       if (!device->status.present)
> +               return device->status.functional;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Fast path - if enabled is set, avoid the more expensive test to
> +        * check whether this device is a processor.
> +        */
> +       if (device->status.enabled)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       return !acpi_device_is_processor(device);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration);
>
> --

I can queue this up for 6.9 as it looks like the rest of the series
will still need some work.  What do you think?



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list