[PATCH v6 001/164] pwm: Provide an inline function to get the parent device of a given chip
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Wed Feb 14 01:30:48 PST 2024
Currently a pwm_chip stores in its struct device *dev member a pointer
to the parent device. Preparing a change that embeds a full struct
device in struct pwm_chip, this accessor function should be used in all
drivers directly accessing chip->dev now. This way struct pwm_chip and
this new function can be changed without having to touch all drivers in
the same change set.
Make use of this function in the framework's core sources.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/pwm.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 1b4c3d0caa82..830a697826af 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (s2.polarity != state->polarity &&
state->duty_cycle < state->period)
- dev_warn(chip->dev, ".apply ignored .polarity\n");
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply ignored .polarity\n");
if (state->enabled &&
last->polarity == state->polarity &&
last->period > s2.period &&
last->period <= state->period)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n",
state->period, s2.period, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n",
state->period, s2.period);
@@ -91,20 +91,20 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
last->period == s2.period &&
last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle &&
last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n",
state->duty_cycle, state->period,
s2.duty_cycle, s2.period,
last->duty_cycle, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n",
state->duty_cycle, state->period,
s2.duty_cycle, s2.period);
if (!state->enabled && s2.enabled && s2.duty_cycle > 0)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
"requested disabled, but yielded enabled with duty > 0\n");
/* reapply the state that the driver reported being configured. */
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
trace_pwm_apply(pwm, &s1, err);
if (err) {
*last = s1;
- dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to reapply current setting\n");
+ dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "failed to reapply current setting\n");
return;
}
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
s1.polarity != last->polarity ||
(s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) ||
(s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) {
- dev_err(chip->dev,
+ dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip),
".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n",
s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period,
last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle,
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *pwmchip_find_by_name(const char *name)
mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id) {
- const char *chip_name = dev_name(chip->dev);
+ const char *chip_name = dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip));
if (chip_name && strcmp(chip_name, name) == 0) {
mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
@@ -456,19 +456,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pwm_single_xlate);
static void of_pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
- if (!chip->dev || !chip->dev->of_node)
+ if (!pwmchip_parent(chip) || !pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node)
return;
if (!chip->of_xlate)
chip->of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
- of_node_get(chip->dev->of_node);
+ of_node_get(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node);
}
static void of_pwmchip_remove(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
- if (chip->dev)
- of_node_put(chip->dev->of_node);
+ if (pwmchip_parent(chip))
+ of_node_put(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node);
}
static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
return false;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_DEBUG) && !ops->get_state)
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
"Please implement the .get_state() callback\n");
return true;
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int __pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct module *owner)
unsigned int i;
int ret;
- if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
+ if (!chip || !pwmchip_parent(chip) || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
return -EINVAL;
if (!pwm_ops_check(chip))
@@ -594,15 +594,15 @@ static struct device_link *pwm_device_link_add(struct device *dev,
* impact the PM sequence ordering: the PWM supplier may get
* suspended before the consumer.
*/
- dev_warn(pwm->chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip),
"No consumer device specified to create a link to\n");
return NULL;
}
- dl = device_link_add(dev, pwm->chip->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
+ dl = device_link_add(dev, pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip), DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
if (!dl) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
- dev_name(pwm->chip->dev));
+ dev_name(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip)));
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *fwnode_to_pwmchip(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id)
- if (chip->dev && device_match_fwnode(chip->dev, fwnode)) {
+ if (pwmchip_parent(chip) && device_match_fwnode(pwmchip_parent(chip), fwnode)) {
mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
return chip;
}
@@ -1085,8 +1085,8 @@ static int pwm_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
seq_printf(s, "%s%d: %s/%s, %d PWM device%s\n",
(char *)s->private, chip->id,
- chip->dev->bus ? chip->dev->bus->name : "no-bus",
- dev_name(chip->dev), chip->npwm,
+ pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus ? pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus->name : "no-bus",
+ dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip)), chip->npwm,
(chip->npwm != 1) ? "s" : "");
pwm_dbg_show(chip, s);
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index 1698609d91c8..3f434a771fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -509,10 +509,10 @@ void pwmchip_sysfs_export(struct pwm_chip *chip)
* If device_create() fails the pwm_chip is still usable by
* the kernel it's just not exported.
*/
- parent = device_create(&pwm_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
+ parent = device_create(&pwm_class, pwmchip_parent(chip), MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
"pwmchip%d", chip->id);
if (IS_ERR(parent)) {
- dev_warn(chip->dev,
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
"device_create failed for pwm_chip sysfs export\n");
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 8ffe9ae7a23a..07af6910bdce 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ struct pwm_chip {
struct pwm_device *pwms;
};
+static inline struct device *pwmchip_parent(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+ return chip->dev;
+}
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)
/* PWM user APIs */
int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state);
--
2.43.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list