[PATCH] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Use named definition for mmc1 card detect
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Tue Dec 17 10:33:14 PST 2024
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 07:25:59PM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
> Hi, Hal
>
> On 12/16/24 18:02, Hal Feng wrote:
> > > On 17.12.24 04:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 20:06:46 -0800, E Shattow wrote:
> > > > Use named definition for mmc1 card detect GPIO instead of numeric literal.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied to riscv-dt-for-next, thanks!
> > >
> > > [1/1] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Use named definition for mmc1
> > > card detect
> > > https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/c96f15d79172
> >
> > No, here "41" means the GPIO number, but GPI_SYS_SDIO1_CD means the
> > multiplexed function and should be used by pinctrl pinmux not gpio subsystem.
> > Although GPI-SYS_SDIO1_CD is numerically the same as 41.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hal
>
> You're right, Hal. I'm confused trying to make sense of this.
>
> From dts/upstream/src/riscv/starfive/jh7110-pinfunc.h:
>
> "gpio nr: gpio number, 0 - 63"
>
> And yet in dts/upstream/src/riscv/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi there's:
>
> > pinmux = <PINMUX(64, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(65, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(66, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(67, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(68, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(69, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(70, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(71, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(72, 0)>,
> > <PINMUX(73, 0)>;
>
>
> Loosely on the subject of MMC interface and GPIO numbering, what is the
> above code doing? These are not GPIO numbers 0-63 so what is this?
>
> I'm trying to understand this so I can write the Mars CM (-Lite) dts.
>
> Conor, and Hal: sorry for the mistake there.
No worries, I've dropped the patch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20241217/41e442ef/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list