[PATCH v3 3/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: add pinctrl support for K1 SoC

Inochi Amaoto inochiama at outlook.com
Fri Aug 30 01:47:39 PDT 2024


On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 07:56:26AM GMT, Yixun Lan wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On 09:36 Fri 30 Aug     , Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:30:25AM GMT, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > > Add pinctrl device tree data to SpacemiT's K1 SoC.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan at gentoo.org>
> > > ---
> > > Note, only minimal device tree data added in this series,
> > > which just try to demonstrate this pinctrl driver, but
> > > more dt data can be added later, in separate patches.
> > > ---
> > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-pinctrl.dtsi |  19 ++++
> > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-pinctrl.h    | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1.dtsi         |   5 +
> > >  3 files changed, 185 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-pinctrl.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000000..1082f92753176
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-pinctrl.dtsi
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2024 Yixun Lan <dlan at gentoo.org>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > > +#include "k1-pinctrl.h"
> > > +
> > 
> > > +&pinctrl {
> > > +	uart0_2_cfg: uart0-2-cfg {
> > > +		uart0-2-pins {
> > > +			pinmux = <K1_PADCONF(GPIO_68, 2)>,
> > > +				 <K1_PADCONF(GPIO_69, 2)>;
> > > +
> > > +			bias-pull-up = <0>;
> > > +			drive-strength = <32>;
> > > +		};
> > > +	};
> > > +};
> > 
> > "uart0_2"? Is not enough to use "uart0"?
> > 
> not sure if I understand your point correctly here, are you saying that
> we should describe all configurations of the "uart0", as there are indeed
> another two options - uart0_0, uart0_1 which using different pins, I can
> add them in next version

I doubt whether it is necessary to add all configuration. Now I think adding
only used is fine and can save a lot space.

> 
> for uart0_2 itself , I would consider it's a complete configuration
> 
> > Although I do not reject to add a new common file, it is better
> > for you to squash this part into the next uart dts patch. I think
> > this is more related.
> > 
> I can squash them into one patch but still with separated pinctrl common file,
> does this sound good to you?

This is OK for me.

> 
> -- 
> Yixun Lan (dlan)
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> GPG Key ID AABEFD55



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list