[PATCH v10 05/40] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI for Guarded Control Stacks
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Fri Aug 16 04:09:01 PDT 2024
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:06:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> +1. General
> +-----------
[...]
> +* EL0 GCS entries with bit 63 set are reserved for use, one such use is defined
Maybe "reserved for specific uses". The proposed sentenced feels like
it's missing something.
> + below for signals and should be ignored when parsing the stack if not
> + understood.
[...]
> +3. Allocation of Guarded Control Stacks
> +----------------------------------------
> +
> +* When GCS is enabled for a thread a new Guarded Control Stack will be
> + allocated for it of size RLIMIT_STACK or 2 gigabytes, whichever is
> + smaller.
> +
> +* When a new thread is created by a thread which has GCS enabled then a
> + new Guarded Control Stack will be allocated for the new thread with
> + half the size of the standard stack.
Is the half size still the case? It also seems a bit inconsistent to
have RLIMIT_STACK when GCS is enabled and half the stack size when a new
thread is created.
[...]
> +* When a thread is freed the Guarded Control Stack initially allocated for
> + that thread will be freed. Note carefully that if the stack has been
> + switched this may not be the stack currently in use by the thread.
Is this true for shadow stacks explicitly allocated by the user with
map_shadow_stack()?
> +4. Signal handling
> +--------------------
> +
> +* A new signal frame record gcs_context encodes the current GCS mode and
> + pointer for the interrupted context on signal delivery. This will always
> + be present on systems that support GCS.
> +
> +* The record contains a flag field which reports the current GCS configuration
> + for the interrupted context as PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS would.
> +
> +* The signal handler is run with the same GCS configuration as the interrupted
> + context.
> +
> +* When GCS is enabled for the interrupted thread a signal handling specific
> + GCS cap token will be written to the GCS, this is an architectural GCS cap
> + token with bit 63 set and the token type (bits 0..11) all clear. The
> + GCSPR_EL0 reported in the signal frame will point to this cap token.
> +
> +* The signal handler will use the same GCS as the interrupted context.
I assume this is true even with sigaltstack. Not easy to have
alternative shadow stack without additional ABI.
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list