[PATCH 1/2] perf daemon: Fix the warning about time_t
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Fri Apr 26 10:28:13 PDT 2024
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024 04:05:00 PST (-0800), ben717 at andestech.com wrote:
> In the 32-bit platform, the size of time_t is still 64 bits. Thus, use
> PRIu64 to resolve the format problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Zong-You Xie <ben717 at andestech.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c b/tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c
> index 83954af36753..0b6ffd51c475 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <sys/signalfd.h>
> #include <sys/wait.h>
> #include <poll.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> #include "builtin.h"
> #include "perf.h"
> #include "debug.h"
> @@ -688,7 +689,7 @@ static int cmd_session_list(struct daemon *daemon, union cmd *cmd, FILE *out)
> /* lock */
> csv_sep, daemon->base, "lock");
>
> - fprintf(out, "%c%lu",
> + fprintf(out, "%c%" PRIu64 "",
> /* session up time */
> csv_sep, (curr - daemon->start) / 60);
>
> @@ -700,7 +701,7 @@ static int cmd_session_list(struct daemon *daemon, union cmd *cmd, FILE *out)
> daemon->base, SESSION_OUTPUT);
> fprintf(out, " lock: %s/lock\n",
> daemon->base);
> - fprintf(out, " up: %lu minutes\n",
> + fprintf(out, " up: %" PRIu64 " minutes\n",
> (curr - daemon->start) / 60);
> }
> }
> @@ -727,7 +728,7 @@ static int cmd_session_list(struct daemon *daemon, union cmd *cmd, FILE *out)
> /* session ack */
> csv_sep, session->base, SESSION_ACK);
>
> - fprintf(out, "%c%lu",
> + fprintf(out, "%c%" PRIu64 "",
> /* session up time */
> csv_sep, (curr - session->start) / 60);
>
> @@ -745,7 +746,7 @@ static int cmd_session_list(struct daemon *daemon, union cmd *cmd, FILE *out)
> session->base, SESSION_CONTROL);
> fprintf(out, " ack: %s/%s\n",
> session->base, SESSION_ACK);
> - fprintf(out, " up: %lu minutes\n",
> + fprintf(out, " up: %" PRIu64 " minutes\n",
> (curr - session->start) / 60);
> }
> }
Sorry I missed this earlier, but IIUC this one is actually incorrect: on
most 32-bit platforms time_t is 32 bits, it was later extended to 64
bits. RISC-V is special because the work to make time_t 64-bit had
started when we submitted the port, so we just jumped straight to the
legacy-free uABI (after some headaches).
So IIUC this would introduce a warning for some other targets. Either
way I shouldn't have picked it up as it's not a RISC-V patch (this is a
generic perf file), so I'm going to drop it from fixes.
Sorry for the confusion!
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list