[PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-riscv: Drop extra CSR write
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Tue Apr 16 18:49:51 PDT 2024
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:56:34 PDT (-0700), apatel at ventanamicro.com wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:03 AM Samuel Holland
> <samuel.holland at sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>> On riscv32, the time comparator value is split across two CSRs. We write
>> both when stopping the timer, but realistically the time is just as
>> unlikely to reach 0xffffffff00000000 as 0xffffffffffffffff, so there is
>> no need to write the low CSR.
>
> Even though unlikely, there is still a theoretical possibility of
> counter reaching value 0xffffffff00000000.
I guess that depends on the timebase frequency, but if my math is right
then we've got some timers that will overflow a 32-bit counter in 10
minutes -- take that with a grain of salt as they're all 64-bit systems
(we don't have any 32-bit DTs upstream?), but it still seems plausible
for 32-bit overflows to happen here on real systems.
> The good thing about value 0xffffffffffffffff is that the counter will
> immediately wrap around after reaching it.
I'm not sure how that's good? Luckily we've got ~100,000 years to
figure out, even on these systems with pretty fast timers ;)
> Regards,
> Anup
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland at sifive.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> index e66dcbd66566..eaaf01f3c34b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
>> @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ static bool riscv_timer_cannot_wake_cpu;
>> static void riscv_clock_event_stop(void)
>> {
>> if (static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) {
>> - csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, ULONG_MAX);
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
>> csr_write(CSR_STIMECMPH, ULONG_MAX);
>> + else
>> + csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, ULONG_MAX);
>> } else {
>> sbi_set_timer(U64_MAX);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.1
>>
>>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list