[PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA

Haibo Xu xiaobo55x at gmail.com
Sat Apr 6 19:53:21 PDT 2024


On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:54 AM Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:57:30PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
> > >> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
> > >> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
> > >> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.
> > >>
> > >
> > > My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to
> > > avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel.
> >
> > There are lots of ACPI enabled systems that aren't NUMA (single
> > socket servers, desktops, laptops). Making this "pr_info()" would just
> > add noise to the boot on all of those.
> >
> Exactly. But this is an existing pr_info message across architectures.
> My suggestion is to add one more patch in this series to convert
> this to pr_debug unless someone has strong reason to keep it pr_info.
>

Sure. I will add a patch to fix it in v3.

Thanks,
Haibo

> Thanks,
> Sunil



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list