[PATCH 7/7] x86: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccess

Suren Baghdasaryan surenb at google.com
Tue Apr 2 22:59:50 PDT 2024


On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:53 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a
> bad access, directly handle error and return, there is no need to
> lock_mm_and_find_vma() and check vm_flags again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>

Looks safe to me.
Using (mm != NULL) to indicate that we are holding mmap_lock is not
ideal but I guess that works.

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb at google.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index a4cc20d0036d..67b18adc75dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -866,14 +866,17 @@ bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
>
>  static void
>  __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
> -          unsigned long address, u32 pkey, int si_code)
> +          unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm,
> +          struct vm_area_struct *vma, u32 pkey, int si_code)
>  {
> -       struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>         /*
>          * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
>          * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
>          */
> -       mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +       if (mm)
> +               mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +       else
> +               vma_end_read(vma);
>
>         __bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, pkey, si_code);
>  }
> @@ -897,7 +900,8 @@ static inline bool bad_area_access_from_pkeys(unsigned long error_code,
>
>  static noinline void
>  bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
> -                     unsigned long address, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +                     unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm,
> +                     struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>         /*
>          * This OSPKE check is not strictly necessary at runtime.
> @@ -927,9 +931,9 @@ bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
>                  */
>                 u32 pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
>
> -               __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR);
> +               __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR);
>         } else {
> -               __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, 0, SEGV_ACCERR);
> +               __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, 0, SEGV_ACCERR);
>         }
>  }
>
> @@ -1357,8 +1361,9 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>                 goto lock_mmap;
>
>         if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) {
> -               vma_end_read(vma);
> -               goto lock_mmap;
> +               bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, NULL, vma);
> +               count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS);
> +               return;
>         }
>         fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs);
>         if (!(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY | VM_FAULT_COMPLETED)))
> @@ -1394,7 +1399,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>          * we can handle it..
>          */
>         if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) {
> -               bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, vma);
> +               bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma);
>                 return;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list