[PATCH v4 3/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zicboz extension and its block size
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Mon Sep 18 06:15:22 PDT 2023
Expose Zicboz through hwprobe and also provide a key to extract its
respective block size. Opportunistically add a macro and apply it to
current extensions in order to avoid duplicating code.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan at rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
---
Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 6 ++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
index a52996b22f75..7b2384de471f 100644
--- a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ The following keys are defined:
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS`: The Zbs extension is supported, as defined
in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions.
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ`: The Zicboz extension is supported, as
+ ratified in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of riscv-CMOs.
+
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0`: A bitmask that contains performance
information about the selected set of processors.
@@ -96,3 +99,6 @@ The following keys are defined:
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
+
+* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
+ represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
index 78936f4ff513..39df8604fea1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
#include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h>
-#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 5
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 6
#endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
index 006bfb48343d..86d08a0e617b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA (1 << 3)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB (1 << 4)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS (1 << 5)
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ (1 << 6)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 5
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN (0 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED (1 << 0)
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST (3 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0)
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE 6
/* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */
#endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
index 473159b5f303..d7266a9abc66 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
@@ -145,26 +145,38 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
- if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA))
- pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
- else
- missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
-
- if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB))
- pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
- else
- missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
-
- if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS))
- pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS;
- else
- missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS;
+#define EXT_KEY(ext) \
+ do { \
+ if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)) \
+ pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \
+ else \
+ missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \
+ } while (false)
+
+ /*
+ * Only use EXT_KEY() for extensions which can be exposed to userspace,
+ * regardless of the kernel's configuration, as no other checks, besides
+ * presence in the hart_isa bitmap, are made.
+ */
+ EXT_KEY(ZBA);
+ EXT_KEY(ZBB);
+ EXT_KEY(ZBS);
+ EXT_KEY(ZICBOZ);
+#undef EXT_KEY
}
/* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */
pair->value &= ~missing;
}
+static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long ext)
+{
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
+
+ hwprobe_isa_ext0(&pair, cpus);
+ return (pair.value & ext);
+}
+
static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
{
int cpu;
@@ -215,6 +227,12 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus);
break;
+ case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE:
+ pair->value = 0;
+ if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ))
+ pair->value = riscv_cboz_block_size;
+ break;
+
/*
* For forward compatibility, unknown keys don't fail the whole
* call, but get their element key set to -1 and value set to 0
--
2.41.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list