[PATCH V11 09/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup
Guo Ren
guoren at kernel.org
Sun Sep 17 08:15:51 PDT 2023
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:32 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:29:03AM -0400, guoren at kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > The early version of T-Head C9xx cores has a store merge buffer
> > delay problem. The store merge buffer could improve the store queue
> > performance by merging multi-store requests, but when there are not
> > continued store requests, the prior single store request would be
> > waiting in the store queue for a long time. That would cause
> > significant problems for communication between multi-cores. This
> > problem was found on sg2042 & th1520 platforms with the qspinlock
> > lock torture test.
> >
> > So appending a fence w.o could immediately flush the store merge
> > buffer and let other cores see the write result.
> >
> > This will apply the WRITE_ONCE errata to handle the non-standard
> > behavior via appending a fence w.o instruction for WRITE_ONCE().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h | 13 -------------
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/rwonce.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/asm-generic/rwonce.h | 2 ++
> > 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/rwonce.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata
> > index 1aa85a427ff3..c919cc3f1a3a 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata
> > @@ -77,4 +77,23 @@ config ERRATA_THEAD_PMU
> >
> > If you don't know what to do here, say "Y".
> >
> > +config ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE
> > + bool "Apply T-Head WRITE_ONCE errata"
> > + depends on ERRATA_THEAD
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + The early version of T-Head C9xx cores has a store merge buffer
> > + delay problem. The store merge buffer could improve the store queue
> > + performance by merging multi-store requests, but when there are no
> > + continued store requests, the prior single store request would be
> > + waiting in the store queue for a long time. That would cause
> > + significant problems for communication between multi-cores. Appending
> > + a fence w.o could immediately flush the store merge buffer and let
> > + other cores see the write result.
> > +
> > + This will apply the WRITE_ONCE errata to handle the non-standard
> > + behavior via appending a fence w.o instruction for WRITE_ONCE().
> > +
> > + If you don't know what to do here, say "Y".
> > +
> > endmenu # "CPU errata selection"
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> > index be84b14f0118..751eb5a7f614 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,23 @@ static bool errata_probe_pmu(unsigned int stage,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool errata_probe_write_once(unsigned int stage,
> > + unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid)
> > +{
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /* target-c9xx cores report arch_id and impid as 0 */
> > + if (arch_id != 0 || impid != 0)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT ||
> > + stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_MODULE)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static u32 thead_errata_probe(unsigned int stage,
> > unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid)
> > {
> > @@ -83,6 +100,9 @@ static u32 thead_errata_probe(unsigned int stage,
> > if (errata_probe_pmu(stage, archid, impid))
> > cpu_req_errata |= BIT(ERRATA_THEAD_PMU);
> >
> > + if (errata_probe_write_once(stage, archid, impid))
> > + cpu_req_errata |= BIT(ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE);
> > +
> > return cpu_req_errata;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h
> > index 712cab7adffe..fbb2b8d39321 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h
> > @@ -11,19 +11,6 @@
> > #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> > #include <asm/vendorid_list.h>
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE
> > -#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_453 0
> > -#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_1200 1
> > -#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_NUMBER 2
> > -#endif
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD
> > -#define ERRATA_THEAD_PBMT 0
> > -#define ERRATA_THEAD_CMO 1
> > -#define ERRATA_THEAD_PMU 2
> > -#define ERRATA_THEAD_NUMBER 3
> > -#endif
> > -
>
> Here I understand you are moving stuff from errata_list.h to
> vendorid_list.h. Wouldn't it be better to do this on a separated patch
> before this one?
Okay.
>
> I understand this is used here, but it looks like it's unrelated.
>
> > #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > #define ALT_INSN_FAULT(x) \
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/rwonce.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..be0b8864969d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/rwonce.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASM_RWONCE_H
> > +#define __ASM_RWONCE_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> > +#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
> > +#include <asm/vendorid_list.h>
> > +
> > +#define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> > +do { \
> > + *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
> > + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( \
> > + __nops(1), \
> > + "fence w, o\n\t", \
> > + THEAD_VENDOR_ID, \
> > + ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE, \
> > + CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE) \
> > + : : : "memory"); \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > +#include <asm-generic/rwonce.h>
> > +
> > +#endif /* __ASM_RWONCE_H */
>
> IIUC the idea here is to have an alternative __WRITE_ONCE that replaces the
> asm-generic one.
>
> Honestly, this asm alternative here seems too much information, and too
> cryptic. I mean, yeah in the patch it all makes sense, but I imagine myself
> in the future looking at all this and trying to understand what is going
> on.
>
> Wouldn't it look better to have something like:
>
> #####
>
> /* Some explanation like the one on Kconfig */
>
> #define write_once_flush() \
> do { \
> asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( \
> __nops(1), \
> "fence w, o\n\t", \
> THEAD_VENDOR_ID, \
> ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE, \
> CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE) \
> : : : "memory"); \
> } while(0)
>
>
> #define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> do { \
> *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
> write_once_flush(); \
> } while(0)
>
> #####
>
>
> This way I could quickly see there is a flush after the writting of
> WRITE_ONCE(), and this flush is the above "complicated" asm.
>
> What do you think?
Okay, good point, and I would take it.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> > index cb89af3f0704..73078cfe4029 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> > @@ -8,4 +8,18 @@
> > #define SIFIVE_VENDOR_ID 0x489
> > #define THEAD_VENDOR_ID 0x5b7
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE
> > +#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_453 0
> > +#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_1200 1
> > +#define ERRATA_SIFIVE_NUMBER 2
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD
> > +#define ERRATA_THEAD_PBMT 0
> > +#define ERRATA_THEAD_CMO 1
> > +#define ERRATA_THEAD_PMU 2
> > +#define ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE 3
> > +#define ERRATA_THEAD_NUMBER 4
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h
> > index 8d0a6280e982..fb07fe8c6e45 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h
> > @@ -50,10 +50,12 @@
> > __READ_ONCE(x); \
> > })
> >
> > +#ifndef __WRITE_ONCE
> > #define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> > do { \
> > *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
> > } while (0)
> > +#endif
> >
> > #define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> > do { \
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list