[PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Vector checksum header
Charlie Jenkins
charlie at rivosinc.com
Thu Sep 7 10:43:22 PDT 2023
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 10:47:55AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:46:52PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > Vector code is written in assembly rather than using the GCC vector
> > instrinsics because they did not provide optimal code. Vector
> > instrinsic types are still used so the inline assembly can
> > appropriately select vector registers. However, this code cannot be
> > merged yet because it is currently not possible to use vector
> > instrinsics in the kernel because vector support needs to be directly
> > enabled by assembly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie at rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > index 3f9d5a202e95..1d6c23cd1221 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
> > #include <linux/in6.h>
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> > +#include <riscv_vector.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
> > typedef unsigned int csum_t;
> > #else
> > @@ -43,6 +47,89 @@ static inline __sum16 csum_fold(__wsum sum)
> > */
> > static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> > {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Vector is likely available when the kernel is compiled with
> > + * vector support, so nop when vector is available and jump when
> > + * vector is not available.
> > + */
> > + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_vector]", "nop", 0,
> > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, 1)
> > + :
> > + :
> > + :
> > + : no_vector);
> > + } else {
> > + if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v))
> > + goto no_vector;
> > + }
>
> Silly question maybe, but is this complexity required?
> If you were to go and do
> if (!has_vector())
> goto no_vector
> is there any meaningful difference difference in performance?
Yes I should use that instead.
>
>
> > +
> > + vuint64m1_t prev_buffer;
> > + vuint32m1_t curr_buffer;
> > + unsigned int vl;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_32_BIT
> > + csum_t high_result, low_result;
> > +
> > + riscv_v_enable();
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch, +v \n\
> > + vsetivli x0, 1, e64, ta, ma \n\
> > + vmv.v.i %[prev_buffer], 0 \n\
> > + 1: \n\
> > + vsetvli %[vl], %[ihl], e32, m1, ta, ma \n\
> > + vle32.v %[curr_buffer], (%[iph]) \n\
> > + vwredsumu.vs %[prev_buffer], %[curr_buffer], %[prev_buffer] \n\
> > + sub %[ihl], %[ihl], %[vl] \n\
> > + slli %[vl], %[vl], 2 \n\
>
> Also, could you please try to align the operands for asm stuff?
> It makes quite a difference to readability.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
Will do.
- Charlie
> > + add %[iph], %[vl], %[iph] \n\
> > + # If not all of iph could fit into vector reg, do another sum \n\
> > + bne %[ihl], zero, 1b \n\
> > + vsetivli x0, 1, e64, m1, ta, ma \n\
> > + vmv.x.s %[low_result], %[prev_buffer] \n\
> > + addi %[vl], x0, 32 \n\
> > + vsrl.vx %[prev_buffer], %[prev_buffer], %[vl] \n\
> > + vmv.x.s %[high_result], %[prev_buffer] \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [vl] "=&r" (vl), [prev_buffer] "=&vd" (prev_buffer),
> > + [curr_buffer] "=&vd" (curr_buffer),
> > + [high_result] "=&r" (high_result),
> > + [low_result] "=&r" (low_result)
> > + : [iph] "r" (iph), [ihl] "r" (ihl));
> > + riscv_v_disable();
> > +
> > + high_result += low_result;
> > + high_result += high_result < low_result;
> > +#else // !CONFIG_32_BIT
> > + csum_t result;
> > +
> > + riscv_v_enable();
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch, +v \n\
> > + vsetivli x0, 1, e64, ta, ma \n\
> > + vmv.v.i %[prev_buffer], 0 \n\
> > + 1: \n\
> > + # Setup 32-bit sum of iph \n\
> > + vsetvli %[vl], %[ihl], e32, m1, ta, ma \n\
> > + vle32.v %[curr_buffer], (%[iph]) \n\
> > + # Sum each 32-bit segment of iph that can fit into a vector reg \n\
> > + vwredsumu.vs %[prev_buffer], %[curr_buffer], %[prev_buffer] \n\
> > + subw %[ihl], %[ihl], %[vl] \n\
> > + slli %[vl], %[vl], 2 \n\
> > + addw %[iph], %[vl], %[iph] \n\
> > + # If not all of iph could fit into vector reg, do another sum \n\
> > + bne %[ihl], zero, 1b \n\
> > + vsetvli x0, x0, e64, m1, ta, ma \n\
> > + vmv.x.s %[result], %[prev_buffer] \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [vl] "=&r" (vl), [prev_buffer] "=&vd" (prev_buffer),
> > + [curr_buffer] "=&vd" (curr_buffer), [result] "=&r" (result)
> > + : [iph] "r" (iph), [ihl] "r" (ihl));
> > + riscv_v_disable();
> > +#endif // !CONFIG_32_BIT
> > +no_vector:
> > +#endif // !CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> > +
> > csum_t csum = 0;
> > int pos = 0;
> >
> >
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list