[PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Sun Oct 29 04:24:30 PDT 2023
On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The Synopsys DesignWare MAC found on StarFive JH7100 SoC is quite
> similar to the newer JH7110, but it requires only two interrupts and a
> single reset line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea at collabora.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 1 +
> .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> index a4d7172ea701..c1380ff1c054 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ properties:
> - snps,dwmac-5.20
> - snps,dwxgmac
> - snps,dwxgmac-2.10
> + - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>
> reg:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> index 44e58755a5a2..70e35a3401f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> @@ -13,10 +13,14 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - items:
> - - enum:
> - - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> - - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> + - const: snps,dwmac
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> + - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
Why do you use different fallback?
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -37,23 +41,6 @@ properties:
> - const: tx
> - const: gtx
>
> - interrupts:
> - minItems: 3
> - maxItems: 3
> -
> - interrupt-names:
> - minItems: 3
> - maxItems: 3
> -
> - resets:
> - minItems: 2
> - maxItems: 2
You just changed it in previous patches... So the previous code allowing
one item was correct?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list