[RFC PATCH] genirq/matrix: Dynamic bitmap allocation
Anup Patel
apatel at ventanamicro.com
Thu Oct 26 21:31:12 PDT 2023
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:47 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26 2023 at 19:26, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > Note that the per-device domain support is already upstream, it's only
> > the ARM cleanups that are not.
> >
> > IOW, there's no need to wait for the ARM cleanups. :-)
>
> Correct. The &*@^@#%$ delayed ARM link was only meant as a reference on
> how this is implemented and obviously as a reminder to the ARM folks to
> get this finally done...
>
> The main point is not to introduce new users of this failed programming
> model and instead make them use the more future proof implementation
> right away - which of course might to turn out to be completely wrong
> 5-10 years from now :)
>
We have three types of MSIs on RISC-V platforms:
1) PCI MSIs (handled by the IMSIC driver of the RISC-V AIA series)
2) Platform MSIs (handled by the IMSIC driver of the RISC-V AIA series)
3) Wired IRQs converted to platform MSIs (aka wired-to-MSI bridge, which
is handled by APLIC driver of the RISC-V AIA series)
The RISC-V AIA series needs the generic IRQ framework changes
related to #2 and #3 (above) from your series hence my suggestion
to rebase on your series.
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121135653.208611233@linutronix.de/)
Is there a way to have your genirq changes merged before all ARM
drivers have been moved to the new programming model ?
OR
Any other way to deal with this dependency ?
Regards,
Anup
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list