[PATCH 04/12] soc: renesas: select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT from ARCH_R9A07G043

Christoph Hellwig hch at lst.de
Tue Oct 17 05:46:08 PDT 2023


On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:44:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:17 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > +   select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > > >     select ERRATA_ANDES if RISCV_SBI
> > > >     select ERRATA_ANDES_CMO if ERRATA_ANDES
> > >
> > > Since this Kconfig menu has changed a bit in linux-next, the selects
> > > are unconditional here, and ERRATA_ANDES_CMO will in turn select
> > > RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT.
> >
> > Oh, looks like another patch landed there in linux-next.  I had
> > waited for the previous one go go upstream in -rc6.  Not sure
> > how to best handle this conflict.
> 
> I think the easiest is to ask soc to apply this series?

I don't think pulling all the DMA bits into a random other tree
would be a good idea.   I can hand off the first few bits, but I'd
need a stable branch to pull in after that.  Which of the half a dozen
soc trees we have in linux-next is this anyway?



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list