[PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__

Zhangjin Wu falcon at tinylab.org
Mon May 29 06:04:02 PDT 2023


nolibc now has INT_MAX in stdint.h, so, don't mix INT_MAX and
__INT_MAX__, unify them to INT_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon at tinylab.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index e75ce6b68565..9ff9d87cc78e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static const struct test test_names[] = {
 int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
 {
 	int min = 0;
-	int max = __INT_MAX__;
+	int max = INT_MAX;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int err;
 	int idx;
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
 				 * here, which defaults to the full range.
 				 */
 				do {
-					min = 0; max = __INT_MAX__;
+					min = 0; max = INT_MAX;
 					value = colon;
 					if (value && *value) {
 						colon = strchr(value, ':');
-- 
2.25.1




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list