[PATCH -next v17 11/20] riscv: Add ptrace vector support

[Rolf Eike Beer]

On Montag, 27. März 2023 18:49:31 CEST Andy Chiu wrote:
> From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
> 
> This patch adds ptrace support for riscv vector. The vector registers will
> be saved in datap pointer of __riscv_v_ext_state. This pointer will be set
> right after the __riscv_v_ext_state data structure then it will be put in
> ubuf for ptrace system call to get or set. It will check if the datap got
> from ubuf is set to the correct address or not when the ptrace system call
> is trying to set the vector registers.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen at sifive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen at sifive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu at sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h |  7 +++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c           | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/elf.h             |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 23c48b14a0e7..75e66c040b64 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -80,6 +84,61 @@ static int riscv_fpr_set(struct task_struct *target,
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> +static int riscv_vr_get(struct task_struct *target,
> +			const struct user_regset *regset,
> +			struct membuf to)
> +{
> +	struct __riscv_v_ext_state *vstate = &target->thread.vstate;
> +
> +	if (!riscv_v_vstate_query(task_pt_regs(target)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure the vector registers have been saved to the memory before
> +	 * copying them to membuf.
> +	 */
> +	if (target == current)
> +		riscv_v_vstate_save(current, task_pt_regs(current));
> +
> +	/* Copy vector header from vstate. */
> +	membuf_write(&to, vstate, offsetof(struct __riscv_v_ext_state, 
datap));
> +	membuf_zero(&to, sizeof(void *));

No idea why I have not seen it in any previous version, but this "sizeof(void 
*)" just made me thing "what is going on here?". I personally would have 
written something like "sizeof(to.var)" or "offsetof(to.buf)" or something like 
that. That makes it easier for me to understand what is skipped/zeroed here, 
let alone making it a bit more fool proof when someone changes one of the 
struct layouts. YMMV.

Regards,

Eike
-- 
Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com
Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11
Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160
Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055

emlix - smart embedded open source
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230328/c2368ea8/attachment.sig>