[PATCH -next V11 1/3] riscv: stack: Support HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:32:51PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:30 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 03:12:37AM -0400, guoren at kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> > >
> > > Add independent irq stacks for percpu to prevent kernel stack overflows.
> > > It is also compatible with VMAP_STACK by implementing
> > > arch_alloc_vmap_stack.  Many architectures have supported
> > > HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK, riscv should follow up.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org>
> >
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,37 @@
> > >  #include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > >  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > >  #include <asm/smp.h>
> > > +#include <asm/vmap_stack.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_STACKS
> > > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(ulong *, irq_stack_ptr);
> >
> > btw, sparse is complaining about this variable:
> > ../arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c:15:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_irq_stack_ptr' was not declared. Should it be static?

> I declared it in traps.c, maybe I should put it in the vmap_stack.h.

Ahh, I was distracted by the DEFINE_PER_CPU above and didn't look at
where the actual declaration was.. Moving it to a header sounds good to
me, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230327/9f341624/attachment.sig>