[PATCH v2] riscv: mm: Fix incorrect ASID argument when flushing TLB
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Thu Mar 23 13:47:03 PDT 2023
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:45:17 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 19:42:37 PDT (-0700), dylan at andestech.com wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:27:30PM +0800, Dylan Jhong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:22:43AM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
>>> > Dylan Jhong <dylan at andestech.com> 於 2023年3月13日 週一 下午12:29寫道:
>>> > >
>>> > > Currently, we pass the CONTEXTID instead of the ASID to the TLB flush
>>> > > function. We should only take the ASID field to prevent from touching
>>> > > the reserved bit field.
>>> > >
>>> > > Fixes: 3f1e782998cd ("riscv: add ASID-based tlbflushing methods")
>>> > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Jhong <dylan at andestech.com>
>>> > > ---
>>> >
>>> > Hi Dylan,
>>> > Thanks for your patch, if I remember correctly, there was a patch from
>>> > Alistair Francis did the similar fix. Perhaps we should track that
>>> > patch to see why it doesn't be merged. Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2022-March/013558.html
>>> >
>>> Hi Zong,
>>> Thanks for the reminder, I didn't notice that Alistair had sent the same patch before.
>>>
>>> Hi Palmer, Alistair
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2022-March/013597.html
>>> This patch does not seem to be cherry-picked back to the released linux kernel,
>>> and I have not seen the v4 patch. May I ask how is the follow-up progress of this patch?
>
> Sorry about that, I guess I left it kind of vague as to who was doing
> what. It looks like we've ended up with enough includes that v3
> actually builds now, it's queued up and should end up in fixes tomorrow
> morning.
Turns out that one still fails some configs, and the one posted here
doesn't. So I've got the new one on fixes.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Dylan
>>>
>>
>> Hi Palmer,
>>
>> Ping. Any update on this?
>>
>> Best,
>> Dylan
>>
>>> > > Changes from v2:
>>> > > - Remove unsued EXPORT_SYMBOL()
>>> > > ---
>>> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 2 ++
>>> > > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 2 +-
>>> > > arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c | 2 +-
>>> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> > >
>>> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>> > > index 907b9efd39a8..597d6d8aec28 100644
>>> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>> > > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>> > > #include <asm/errata_list.h>
>>> > >
>>> > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>>> > > +extern unsigned long asid_mask;
>>> > > +
>>> > > static inline void local_flush_tlb_all(void)
>>> > > {
>>> > > __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma" : : : "memory");
>>> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
>>> > > index 80ce9caba8d2..6d1aeb063e81 100644
>>> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
>>> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
>>> > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator);
>>> > >
>>> > > static unsigned long asid_bits;
>>> > > static unsigned long num_asids;
>>> > > -static unsigned long asid_mask;
>>> > > +unsigned long asid_mask;
>>> > >
>>> > > static atomic_long_t current_version;
>>> > >
>>> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
>>> > > index ce7dfc81bb3f..ba4c27187c95 100644
>>> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
>>> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
>>> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>>> > > /* check if the tlbflush needs to be sent to other CPUs */
>>> > > broadcast = cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) < nr_cpu_ids;
>>> > > if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) {
>>> > > - unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id);
>>> > > + unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id) & asid_mask;
>>> > >
>>> > > /*
>>> > > * TLB will be immediately flushed on harts concurrently
>>> > > --
>>> > > 2.34.1
>>> > >
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list