[PATCH] riscv: require alternatives framework when selecting FPU support

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 08:26:10PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 03:17:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:

> > > (It's tempting to just select RISCV_ALTERNATIVE from RISCV, but maybe we
> > >  can defer that wedding a bit longer.)
> > 
> > At that point, the config option should just go away entirely, no?
> 
> Ah, yes, and that makes the idea even more attractive, as we could remove
> several ifdefs.

I went and did the cursory check, it's not compatible with XIP_KERNEL so
dropping the option entirely probably isn't a possibility :/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230322/600cd482/attachment.sig>