[PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: soc: starfive: syscon: Add optional patternProperties

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/03/2023 04:05, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> Add optional compatible and patternProperties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu at starfivetech.com>
> ---
>  .../soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml  | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml
> index ae7f1d6916af..b61d8921ef42 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml
> @@ -15,16 +15,31 @@ description: |
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - enum:
> -          - starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon
> -          - starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon
> -          - starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon
> -      - const: syscon
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon
> +              - starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon
> +              - starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon
> +          - const: syscon
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon
> +              - starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon
> +              - starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon
> +          - const: syscon
> +          - const: simple-mfd
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +patternProperties:
> +  # Optional children
> +  "pll-clock-controller":

It's not a pattern.

Anyway should be clock-controller

> +    type: object
> +    $ref: /schemas/clock/starfive,jh7110-pll.yaml#
> +    description: Clock provider for PLL.
> +

You just added these bindings! So the initial submission was incomplete
on purpose?

No, add complete bindings.

>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -38,4 +53,16 @@ examples:
>          reg = <0x10240000 0x1000>;
>      };
>  
> +  - |
> +    syscon at 13030000 {

No need for new example... Just put it in existing one.


Best regards,
Krzysztof