[PATCH] Revert "riscv: Set more data to cacheinfo"
Song Shuai
suagrfillet at gmail.com
Tue Mar 7 22:47:34 PST 2023
This reverts commit baf7cbd94b5688f167443a2cc3dcea3300132099.
There are some duplicate cache attributes populations executed
in both ci_leaf_init() and later cache_setup_properties().
Revert the commit baf7cbd94b56 ("riscv: Set more data to cacheinfo")
to setup only the level and type attributes at this early place.
Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet at gmail.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 66 ++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 3a13113f1b29..305ebbdc780d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -64,53 +64,12 @@ uintptr_t get_cache_geometry(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
0;
}
-static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, enum cache_type type,
- unsigned int level, unsigned int size,
- unsigned int sets, unsigned int line_size)
+static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
+ struct device_node *node,
+ enum cache_type type, unsigned int level)
{
this_leaf->level = level;
this_leaf->type = type;
- this_leaf->size = size;
- this_leaf->number_of_sets = sets;
- this_leaf->coherency_line_size = line_size;
-
- /*
- * If the cache is fully associative, there is no need to
- * check the other properties.
- */
- if (sets == 1)
- return;
-
- /*
- * Set the ways number for n-ways associative, make sure
- * all properties are big than zero.
- */
- if (sets > 0 && size > 0 && line_size > 0)
- this_leaf->ways_of_associativity = (size / sets) / line_size;
-}
-
-static void fill_cacheinfo(struct cacheinfo **this_leaf,
- struct device_node *node, unsigned int level)
-{
- unsigned int size, sets, line_size;
-
- if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "cache-size", &size) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "cache-block-size", &line_size) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "cache-sets", &sets)) {
- ci_leaf_init((*this_leaf)++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, size, sets, line_size);
- }
-
- if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "i-cache-size", &size) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "i-cache-sets", &sets) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "i-cache-block-size", &line_size)) {
- ci_leaf_init((*this_leaf)++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level, size, sets, line_size);
- }
-
- if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "d-cache-size", &size) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "d-cache-sets", &sets) &&
- !of_property_read_u32(node, "d-cache-block-size", &line_size)) {
- ci_leaf_init((*this_leaf)++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level, size, sets, line_size);
- }
}
int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -121,24 +80,29 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
struct device_node *prev = NULL;
int levels = 1, level = 1;
- /* Level 1 caches in cpu node */
- fill_cacheinfo(&this_leaf, np, level);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
- /* Next level caches in cache nodes */
prev = np;
while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) {
of_node_put(prev);
prev = np;
-
if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache"))
break;
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level))
break;
if (level <= levels)
break;
-
- fill_cacheinfo(&this_leaf, np, level);
-
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
+ ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
levels = level;
}
of_node_put(np);
--
2.20.1
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list