[PATCH v4 08/10] irqchip: Add RISC-V advanced PLIC driver

[Conor Dooley]

Hey Saravana,

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:17:08PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:35 AM Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com> wrote:

btw, please try to delete the 100s of lines of unrelated context when
replying

> > +static int __init aplic_dt_init(struct device_node *node,
> > +                               struct device_node *parent)
> > +{
> > +       /*
> > +        * The APLIC platform driver needs to be probed early
> > +        * so for device tree:
> > +        *
> > +        * 1) Set the FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT flag in fwnode which
> > +        *    provides a hint to the device driver core to probe the
> > +        *    platform driver early.
> > +        * 2) Clear the OF_POPULATED flag in device_node because
> > +        *    of_irq_init() sets it which prevents creation of
> > +        *    platform device.
> > +        */
> > +       node->fwnode.flags |= FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT;
> 
> NACK. You are blindly plastering flags without trying to understand
> the real issue and fixing this correctly.
> 
> > +       of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv_aplic, "riscv,aplic", aplic_dt_init);
> 
> This macro pretty much skips the entire driver core framework to probe
> and calls init and you are supposed to initialize the device when the
> init function is called.
> 
> If you want your device/driver to follow the proper platform driver
> path (which is recommended), then you need to use the
> IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN() and related macros. Grep for plenty of examples.
> 
> I offered to help you debug this issue and I asked for a dts file that
> corresponds to a board you are testing this on and seeing an issue.

There isn't a dts file for this because there's no publicly available
hardware that actually has an APLIC. Maybe Ventana have pre-production
silicon that has it, but otherwise it's a QEMU job.

Cheers,
Conor.

> But you haven't answered my question [1] and are pointing to some
> random commit and blaming it. That commit has no impact on any
> existing devices/drivers.
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Please consider this patch Nacked as long as FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT
> is used or until Anup actually works with us to debug the real issue.
> 
> -Saravana
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAhSdy2p6K70fc2yZLPdVGqEq61Y8F7WVT2J8st5mQrzBi4WHg@mail.gmail.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230615/ef8551d5/attachment.sig>