[PATCH v2] Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: mention patchwork's role
Björn Töpel
bjorn at kernel.org
Tue Jun 13 06:00:37 PDT 2023
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> writes:
> Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the
> weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we
> should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork
> instance plays in patch acceptance.
>
> Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> ---
> I was also not sure if this was the correct doc for this, or whether a
> process/maintainer-riscv.rst file was better suited. There's clearly no
> rush on this though so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm fine with this file. Thanks for adding it!
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn at rivosinc.com>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list