[PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile for rv32
Zhangjin Wu
falcon at tinylab.org
Tue Jun 6 05:07:55 PDT 2023
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 13:12, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, at 11:05, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> >> would seem more consistent with how x86 is handled, and would
> >> probably be more easily extensible if we want to also make
> >> this work with other sub-targets like mipseb, armv5 or ppc32
> >> in the future.
> >
> > As Arnd and Thomas suggested to align with x86, I just tried to find a
> > solution to avoid mixing the use of _ARCH and ARCH in this Makefile.
> >
> > Since both riscv32 and riscv64 share the same SRCARCH=riscv (arch/riscv),
> > and the kernel side doesn't accept riscv32 or riscv64 currently, we need to
> > manually convert them to _ARCH=riscv and pass them to the kernel makefile
> > like this: ARCH=$(_ARCH), it mixes the use of _ARCH and ARCH, this is why I
> > used the '$(if' method currently.
> >
> > The solution is adding something like x86 in the kernel Makefile:
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 9d765ebcccf1..a442c893d795 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -415,6 +415,14 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),parisc64)
> > SRCARCH := parisc
> > endif
> >
> > +# Additional ARCH settings for riscv
> > +ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv32)
> > + SRCARCH := riscv
> > +endif
> > +ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv64)
> > + SRCARCH := riscv
> > +endif
> > +
> > export cross_compiling :=
> > ifneq ($(SRCARCH),$(SUBARCH))
> > cross_compiling := 1
>
> I've never been a big fan of the top-level $(ARCH) setting
> in the kernel, is there a reason this has to be the same
> as the variable in tools/include/nolibc? If not, I'd just
> leave the Linux Makefile unchanged.
>
> For userspace we have a lot more target names than
> arch/*/ directories in the kernel, and I don't think
> I'd want to enumerate all the possibilities in the
> build system globally.
Ok, agree very much, it is the root cause why we used the old method
before, because I don't want to touch the top-level Makefile, here
explains the details again just as did for Thomas and Willy [1] ;-)
Without the top-level makefile change, we must add something in
selftests/nolibc/Makefile like this, because the kernel makefile doesn't
accept something like ARCH=riscv32 and ARCH=riscv64 currently, it only
accepts ARCH=riscv (will paste the code later).
ifneq ($(findstring riscv,$(ARCH)),)
_ARCH = riscv
else
_ARCH = $(ARCH)
endif
...
sysroot/$(ARCH)/include:
$(Q)rm -rf sysroot/$(ARCH) sysroot/sysroot
$(QUIET_MKDIR)mkdir -p sysroot
$(Q)$(MAKE) -C ../../../include/nolibc ARCH=$(_ARCH) OUTPUT=$(CURDIR)/sysroot/ headers_standalone
$(Q)mv sysroot/sysroot sysroot/$(ARCH)
defconfig:
$(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(_ARCH) CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) mrproper $(DEFCONFIG) prepare
kernel: initramfs
$(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(_ARCH) CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) $(IMAGE_NAME) CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=$(CURDIR)/initramfs
The above change really works, but it looks not that good, this is the
mixing use of _ARCH and ARCH I mentioned in last reply.
Otherwise, we will get such error:
$ make run ARCH=riscv64 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
MKDIR sysroot/riscv64/include
make[1]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
make[2]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
Makefile:763: arch/riscv64/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/riscv64/Makefile'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:87: headers_standalone] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
make: *** [Makefile:129: sysroot/riscv64/include] Error 2
$ make run ARCH=riscv32 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
MKDIR sysroot/riscv32/include
make[1]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
make[2]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
Makefile:763: arch/riscv32/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/riscv32/Makefile'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:87: headers_standalone] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
make: *** [Makefile:129: sysroot/riscv32/include] Error 2
That's because in top-level Makefile, it doesn't accept ARCH=riscv32 and
ARCH=riscv64, but x86 and sparc and even parisc support such variants,
this allows the ARCH variants share the same arch/<SRCARCH>/ source code
tree, otherwise, they will directly find the arch/<ARCH>/ source code,
then fails.
top-level Makefile:
...
ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
# Architecture as present in compile.h
UTS_MACHINE := $(ARCH)
SRCARCH := $(ARCH) ---> SRCARCH is assigned as ARCH by default
# Additional ARCH settings for x86
ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
SRCARCH := x86
endif
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
SRCARCH := x86
endif
# Additional ARCH settings for sparc
ifeq ($(ARCH),sparc32)
SRCARCH := sparc
endif
ifeq ($(ARCH),sparc64)
SRCARCH := sparc
endif
# Additional ARCH settings for parisc
ifeq ($(ARCH),parisc64)
SRCARCH := parisc
endif
So, to really align with x86, we should let the top-level makefile be
able to get the right SRCARCH for riscv32 and riscv64 too ;-)
I even tried to pass SRCARCH=riscv to the top-level Makefile, but it
failed:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 1b2247a6365d..04067776b569 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ include $(srctree)/scripts/subarch.include
ARCH = $(SUBARCH)
endif
+ifneq ($(findstring riscv,$(ARCH)),)
+SRCARCH := SRCARCH=riscv
+endif
+
# kernel image names by architecture
IMAGE_i386 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
IMAGE_x86_64 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
@@ -126,7 +130,7 @@ sysroot: sysroot/$(ARCH)/include
sysroot/$(ARCH)/include:
$(Q)rm -rf sysroot/$(ARCH) sysroot/sysroot
$(QUIET_MKDIR)mkdir -p sysroot
- $(Q)$(MAKE) -C ../../../include/nolibc ARCH=$(ARCH) OUTPUT=$(CURDIR)/sysroot/ headers_standalone
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -C ../../../include/nolibc ARCH=$(ARCH) $(SRCARCH) OUTPUT=$(CURDIR)/sysroot/ headers_standalone
$(Q)mv sysroot/sysroot sysroot/$(ARCH)
nolibc-test: nolibc-test.c sysroot/$(ARCH)/include
@@ -150,10 +154,10 @@ initramfs: nolibc-test
$(Q)cp nolibc-test initramfs/init
defconfig:
- $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(ARCH) CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) mrproper $(DEFCONFIG) prepare
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(ARCH) $(SRCARCH) CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) mrproper $(DEFCONFIG) prepare
kernel: initramfs
- $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(ARCH) CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) $(IMAGE_NAME) CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=$(CURDIR)/initramfs
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree) ARCH=$(ARCH) $(SRCARCH )CC=$(CC) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS_COMPILE) $(IMAGE_NAME) CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=$(CURDIR)/initramfs
# run the tests after building the kernel
run: kernel
$ make run ARCH=riscv32 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- QEMU_ARGS_EXTRA="-bios /labs/linux-lab/opensbi-riscv32-generic-fw_dynamic.bin"
MKDIR sysroot/riscv32/include
make[1]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
make[2]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
Makefile:397: srcarch: riscv
make[2]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
make[2]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
Makefile:397: srcarch: riscv
INSTALL /labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/sysroot/sysroot/include
make[2]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
make[1]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/include/nolibc'
CC nolibc-test
MKDIR initramfs
INSTALL initramfs/init
make[1]: Entering directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
Makefile:397: srcarch: riscv32
SYNC include/config/auto.conf.cmd
Makefile:397: srcarch: riscv32
Makefile:687: arch/riscv32/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/riscv32/Makefile'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:795: include/config/auto.conf.cmd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable'
So, to keep consistent eventually, perhaps we do need to touch the
top-level Makefile.
Best regards,
Zhangjin
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230526092029.149351-1-falcon@tinylab.org/
> Arnd
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list