[PATCH v2 1/3] iio: adc: Add Allwinner D1/T113s/R329/T507 SoCs GPADC
Maxim Kiselev
bigunclemax at gmail.com
Sun Jun 4 13:53:30 PDT 2023
пт, 2 июн. 2023 г. в 17:49, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>:
...
> The locks should be explained (what are they for? what do they protect?).
I added the explanation comment in the next version.
...
> > +static const struct regmap_config sun20i_gpadc_regmap_config = {
> > + .reg_bits = 32,
> > + .val_bits = 32,
> > + .reg_stride = 4,
> > + .fast_io = true,
>
> I forgot if I asked about regmap lock do you need it?
I think we could drop the regmap altogether. As Andy suggested in
previous series.
...
> > + if (num_channels > SUN20I_GPADC_MAX_CHANNELS) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "num of channel children out of range");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Is it really critical error?
Yes, as Jonathan already noted, this may lead to out of range error.
вс, 4 июн. 2023 г. в 13:46, Jonathan Cameron <jic23 at kernel.org>:
...
> We try to make this name identify the chip in question.
> If the driver name is sufficient for these platforms then fair enough.
> It should certainly be enough to distinguish this from other ADCs on the
> platform.
I believe the driver name should be enough. All listed SoCs have the
same GPADC register
layout and differ only in the number of channels.
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list