[PATCH 3/9] drm/verisilicon: Add basic drm driver

Keith Zhao keith.zhao at starfivetech.com
Mon Jul 24 20:12:01 PDT 2023



On 2023/6/7 16:53, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Keith,
> 
> Am Freitag, dem 02.06.2023 um 15:40 +0800 schrieb Keith Zhao:
>> Add a basic platform driver of the DRM driver for JH7110 SoC.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Zhao <keith.zhao at starfivetech.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                          |   2 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig              |   2 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile             |   1 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig  |  13 ++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Makefile |   6 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_drv.c | 284 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_drv.h |  48 +++++
>>  include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h        |  83 ++++++++
>>  include/uapi/drm/vs_drm.h            |  50 +++++
>>  9 files changed, 489 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Makefile
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_drv.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_drv.h
>>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/drm/vs_drm.h
>> 
>> 
>> [...]
>> +#endif /* __VS_DRV_H__ */
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
>> index de703c6be969..af4fb50f9207 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
>> @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ extern "C" {
>>  #define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_ARM     0x08
>>  #define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_ALLWINNER 0x09
>>  #define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_AMLOGIC 0x0a
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_VS      0x0b
>>  
>>  /* add more to the end as needed */
>>  
>> @@ -1519,6 +1520,88 @@ drm_fourcc_canonicalize_nvidia_format_mod(__u64 modifier)
>>  #define AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(field) \
>>  	(~((__u64)AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_MASK << AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT))
>>  
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_NORMAL        0x00
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_COMPRESSED    0x01
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_CUSTOM_10BIT  0x02
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_MASK     ((__u64)0x3 << 54)
>> +
>> +#define fourcc_mod_vs_code(type, val) \
>> +	fourcc_mod_code(VS, ((((__u64)type) << 54) | (val)))
>> +
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_MODE_MASK    0x3F
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_8X8_XMAJOR   0x00
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_8X8_YMAJOR   0x01
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_16X4     0x02
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_8X4      0x03
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_4X8      0x04
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_16X4   0x06
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_64X4     0x07
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_32X4     0x08
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_256X1  0x09
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_128X1  0x0A
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_64X4   0x0B
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_256X2  0x0C
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_128X2  0x0D
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_128X4  0x0E
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_64X1   0x0F
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_16X8     0x10
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_8X16     0x11
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_512X1  0x12
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_32X4   0x13
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_64X2   0x14
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_32X2   0x15
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_32X1   0x16
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_RASTER_16X1   0x17
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_128X4    0x18
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_256X4    0x19
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_512X4    0x1A
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_16X16    0x1B
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_32X16    0x1C
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_64X16    0x1D
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_128X8    0x1E
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_8X4_S    0x1F
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_16X4_S   0x20
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_32X4_S   0x21
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_16X4_LSB 0x22
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_32X4_LSB 0x23
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_TILE_32X8     0x24
>> +
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_ALIGN_32      (0x01 << 6)
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_DEC_ALIGN_64      (0x01 << 7)
>> +
>> +#define fourcc_mod_vs_dec_code(tile, align) \
>> +	fourcc_mod_vs_code(DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_COMPRESSED, \
>> +				((tile) | (align)))
>> +
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_NORM_MODE_MASK        0x1F
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_LINEAR                0x00
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILED4x4              0x01
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_SUPER_TILED_XMAJOR    0x02
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_SUPER_TILED_YMAJOR    0x03
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_8X8              0x04
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE1            0x05
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE2            0x06
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_8X4              0x07
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE4            0x08
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE5            0x09
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE6            0x0A
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_SUPER_TILED_XMAJOR_8X4    0x0B
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_SUPER_TILED_YMAJOR_4X8    0x0C
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_Y                0x0D
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_128X1            0x0F
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_256X1            0x10
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_32X1             0x11
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_64X1             0x12
>> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TILE_MODE4X4          0x15
>> +
>> +#define fourcc_mod_vs_norm_code(tile) \
>> +	fourcc_mod_vs_code(DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_NORMAL, \
>> +				(tile))
>> +
>> +#define fourcc_mod_vs_custom_code(tile) \
>> +	fourcc_mod_vs_code(DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VS_TYPE_CUSTOM_10BIT, \
>> +				(tile))
>> +
> 
> You are opening a new namespace for what is effectively the VIVANTE
> tiling. While your list seems much more exhaustive than the (reverse
> engineered) list provided under the VIVANTE namespace, this is still
> unacceptable as it adds new aliases for existing modifiers.
> 
hi Lucas:
I got what you mean , I will check the whether the current existence can be reused.
In principle, can existing modefiers cover my definition?

> Also any modifier additions should be in a separate patch and not
> buried in another change.
> 
ok , no problem
> Regards,
> Lucas



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list